Respected Windows 7 Tweaks

Ah yes I only had Aero peek hover time set to 0 ages ago, have added the others :)

I have created .reg files for default and modified so applying is easy on new machines :).
 
Last edited:
windows 7 tweaks thread seems pretty empty... lol

"you can increase right click speed" oh the joy.

Probably because it doesn't need them as much as other versions once did?

Seems a pretty fast and stable O/S to me.

Running 64bit with at least a few GB of RAM seems more than adequate and disabling a few services and uninstalling a few little bits of software isn't going to greatly impact on an already speedy system.

I guess the definition of tweaking and customisation probably cause a bit of a debate here. I see tweaking as fine tuning, improving performance and generally getting the most out of what you have; I don't see a lot of room for this in W7 as there are many improvements in overall performance and memory management.

Customisation would be more along a specific route of exactly how an individual would want something to work or perform. Such as you and your task bar gripe. Granted it's missing something that was included in previous O/S but to be honest they have added in many more features where the benefits far outweigh the disadvantages that might have been caused by taking some out, imo.
 
how does it get through testing ?

At great expense with lots of very clever, knowledgable people.

they must ask some windows 7 fan boys to test it who don't moan about a thing. like asking the guys from gizmodo to test an apple product. They won't find any bugs cause they are so blind in love with steve jobs...

Yes there are fanboys for any platform, hardware, tech, music, actor, author, whatever. However, Windows 7 was extensively tested by the public last year in the open BETA and RC. Most windows had the option to leave feedback and rather a lot of it was taken on-board.

Also what is seriously lacking is per windows properties, full window transparency and "always on top" settings for each windows. I mean other OS had this 10 years ago i don't see why MS can't do it when some 3rd party apps do it perfectly.

More customization options would always be nice, but it's a matter of whether enough people even want that feature. A few disgruntled users like yourself doesn't make it very pressing.

I seriously think they have the wrong people testing their operating systems.

Then you think entirely wrong. As I said it was tested by thousands and thousands of end users during the BETA and RC.

You have a real chip on your shoulder when it comes to MS and it is somewhat boring. You let it cloud your own judgement and makes you instantly think MS sucks when you have a problem - your recent thread about your HDDs spinning down being a prime example.

No OS is perfect, and none will ever be.
 
ms fanboys telling me i have chip on my shoulder because windows 7 hard drive sleep mode was causing my hds to make ridiculously loud noises and come up with messages telling me to backup data... prime example of what exactly ?

i don't instantly think ms sucks because i have a problem. i think ms sucks because i have been using their OS for 10+ years. i have said i like windows 7 after 4 hours of disabling and customizing options. tweaks to me is registry changes that allow you to make changes that are not in the standard gui available for changing. for example windows xp has the tweak ui software that allowed you to make some changes. I see no reason to have the attitude of "no os is perfect so don't say anything bad about ms and shut up."

as for testing, sure i am being a bit obnoxious about it. just trying to make a joke about it as well.
 
Windows 7 didn't cause your drives to make a noise at all. Your drives being faulty at that time did and Windows merely notified you via its SMART monitoring features that you should back up data to avoid loss and replace the drives as soon as possible.

There's no jokes to be made because nobody can joke about Windows 7 (or Vista, now, for that matter) because they're completely capable OSes.
 
after disabling the hd sleep mode my hds are working 100% with no noises. i have smart disabled.

i am not hating on windows 7, just saying my experience, maybe some one will be able to learn from it, don't take it too seriously.
 
Last edited:
ms fanboys telling me i have chip on my shoulder because windows 7 hard drive sleep mode was causing my hds to make ridiculously loud noises and come up with messages telling me to backup data... prime example of what exactly ?

I am not an MS fanboy. I know Windows has problems, just far less with their latest OS. I used to be exlusively a Linux user for quite a while and I am eye-ing up a MacBook Pro after having used OSX for a while not long ago.

And you do have a chip on your shoulder. You were slagging off Windows 7 before you even tried it, and whenever something happens you don't agree with you get this militant attitude towards MS and if someone disagrees with you they are suddenly a fanboy. If there was such a thing as an anti-fanboy it would be you.

Windows 7 detected something wasn't quite right with your disks and informed you to backup your stuff. If you disks had failed spectacularly and Windows had said nothing, you no doubt would be complaining about that too.

Your disks crunching away is nothing to do with the OS. It just tells your disks to go to sleep, and the controller/firmware does the rest.

i don't instantly think ms sucks because i have a problem. i think ms sucks because i have been using their OS for 10+ years.
If they're that bad stop using their products.

i have said i like windows 7 after 4 hours of disabling and customizing options. tweaks to me is registry changes that allow you to make changes that are not in the standard gui available for changing. for example windows xp has the tweak ui software that allowed you to make some changes. I see no reason to have the attitude of "no os is perfect so don't say anything bad about ms and shut up."
The "No OS is perfect" comment was a simple statement of fact. It was not meant as an excuse, though I am not surprised you came to that conclusion.

No developer can do everything every user wants. A rather apt quote is "to ship is to choose". You saying MS and their testing sucks because they don't include a specific GUI option you want is just silly.

Frankly I would rather MS spend their time on the exceptional resource management, security and performance than worry about specific GUI additions and tweaks that 99% of people find more than acceptable as they are [or are capable, as yourself, of tweaking.]

as for testing, sure i am being a bit obnoxious about it. just trying to make a joke about it as well.

Wasn't all that obvious given the tone of your post.

I will leave it at that as the thread has been derailed somewhat.
 
doesn't windows search manage the start menu search function

i would really keep it enabled TBH

+1

<3 that feature more than life itself.

For anything at all; windows button on keyboard, type the first word of whatever it is and hey presto. The amount of clicks I have saved through this feature...astounding :D
 
Well, you wont do any harm. But you are taking away the means to restore your system in the event of a botched update, software installation or some other accident.
 
I always disable it, Windows updates can be un-installed if they cause problems (assuming safemode still works)

Driver rollback still works
 
You can if you want and have alternative backup means for your OS and settings.

Alternatively the wiser solution is to drop the System restore allocation to a smaller size like 1% of your drive so if you have a 500GB OS drive then SR will allocate a bit above 4.6GB.

SR will create a checkpoint before any system change takes affect so you can revert back if needed. It's a handy thing to have and also forms a part of the shadow copy part of the OS so you can selectively restore a certain file if needed or view the contents of a folder using the Previous Versions tab and export it to another location.

It's a great feature set for administering a system especially since System Restore has no negative impact on system performance.
 
Last edited:
Sorry for hijacking this thread but is it safe to disable system restore in windows 7?

I've never used system restore in my life. Never needed to, and always keep it disabled.

So it must be safe.

I'm not saying it's a pointless feature, it's definitely useful. It's just that I've never needed it.
 
On windows xp system restore saved me losing data when I lent the laptop to my sister and somehow she corrupted part of the HD and stopped the laptop from booting, and windows repair wasnt working as well because it couldnt detect that a windows installation already existed.

So then I was able to go into the system restore volume from a linux boot disc and extract a file I needed to get it to boot. Didnt like the idea of actually running system restore though.

Im almost at a stage where Im comfortable with how things are working on win7 now.
 
Thanks for those tweaks Bledd. Its stuff like that that I feel Microsoft should implement in a GUI for us to edit. I used to love powertoys for winxp :)
 
Did they ever replace the XP image resize powertoy? Now that was brilliant. I seem to remember a version for Vista floating around but don't recall it being as good.

Since I figured out how to do batch resizing in Irfanview I've not missed it as much but the odd occasion it would be really handy.
 
Back
Top Bottom