On a road bike the red bike lanes to the left of the road are often far rougher than the rest of the road and contain more rubbish likely to give you a puncture. 'Vehicular' cycling is far better than riding in the gutter or on the pavement.
After? watch it again
He pulls out to overtake a cyclist, the cab overtakes him and cuts into his lane and slows down before he has passed him, then he slaps the cab as their both slowing down and the childish theatrics from the pair of them begin.
And just as a point its not a cycle lane, it has no boundary marks that denote it as one, its merely saying the the road is a cycle route and with the speed the cyclist was travelling at, in excess of 20mph his lane positioning was quite correct and infact recommended by dft and the IAM
He had room and time to pull back in after overtaking the cyclist. Poor cycling, especially on those roads where there are hazards everywhere. If a car overtakes another car it doesn't stay on the opposite side of the road unnecessarily, does it?
As for the lane, stop being pedantic, you know what it's meant for, its there and clearly marked for safety. I know where I'd be cycling if I were on that road. If you think the cyclist was not in any way in the wrong I fear for you as a cyclist, I really do. And if the DFT are recommending poor overtaking manoeuvres, well![]()
Again, the driver was not completely faultless, but the cyclist was made the first mistake IMO.
He had room and time to pull back in after overtaking the cyclist. Poor cycling, especially on those roads where there are hazards everywhere. If a car overtakes another car it doesn't stay on the opposite side of the road unnecessarily, does it?
As for the lane, stop being pedantic, you know what it's meant for, its there and clearly marked for safety. I know where I'd be cycling if I were on that road. If you think the cyclist was not in any way in the wrong I fear for you as a cyclist, I really do. And if the DFT are recommending poor overtaking manoeuvres, well![]()
He had room and time to pull back in after overtaking the cyclist. Poor cycling, especially on those roads where there are hazards everywhere. If a car overtakes another car it doesn't stay on the opposite side of the road unnecessarily, does it?
As for the lane, stop being pedantic, you know what it's meant for, its there and clearly marked for safety. I know where I'd be cycling if I were on that road. If you think the cyclist was not in any way in the wrong I fear for you as a cyclist, I really do. And if the DFT are recommending poor overtaking manoeuvres, well![]()
Again, the driver was not completely faultless, but the cyclist was made the first mistake IMO.

Well I can only laugh at the comments from people who think the cyclist was faultless. The fact remains, the cyclist was a douche and goes looking for trouble if you watch his other videos. I still think the Taxi left him plenty of room. Agree to disagree I think.![]()
No point in arguing when each side thinks they're right. In my opinion I don't think the Taxi driver got too close in the initial manoeuvre so we can only agree to disagree.