Anyone fancy trying to simply frame geometry for me please my head is hurting to work this out
Geometry of the bike I smashed up http://technobike.com/hot_promo/detail/ORBEA ORCA B105 BLACK YELLOW
Geometry of my winter bike
http://www.sigmasport.co.uk/item/Specialized/Allez-Sport-Int-C2-Road-Bike-2013/1D82
I'm after a new bike based on the geometry of the Orbea and not anything like the Allez geometry.
For example I'm looking at cannondales based on the above should I be looking at the Super Six or Synapse? Also my preferred LBS stock Trek bikes which Trek frames offer a similar geometry to the Orbea.
As I can't get out to try them at the moment I'm slowly trying to discount certain bike based on the geometry.
Cheers in advance
comparing the 53 orbea to the 54 cannondales, with all 3 having an effective top tube between 54cm and 54.5, the super six seems closer to the orbea (both having 14cm headtubes) than the synapse. The synapse is much taller at the front, over 2.5cm...
i'll add the caveat that the orbea's head angle is slacker than the super six, that means it'll steer a bit slower, but feel more stable. The synapse head angle is much closer to the orbea's
how many spacers do you run on the orbea?
Last edited:

Since having my plum related off a few weeks back I've not been getting out on the bike much and on my two rides this week I've been a bit cautious of cornering at any speed. I decided that I'd investigate whether I could get away with running my tyres at a slightly lower PSI.