Underboss
I see that RM are no longer accepting batteries of any kind and no electronics
so you can no longer post your mobile phone or your camera etc etc via RM
so you can no longer post your mobile phone or your camera etc etc via RM
Got a source? There restricted item list still says it's fine.I see that RM are no longer accepting batteries of any kind and no electronics
so you can no longer post your mobile phone or your camera etc etc via RM
Lithium ion / polymer batteries - contained in / connected to equipment / devices >>
(for example rechargeable batteries/cells found in portable electronics such as laptops, mobile phones, iPads, camcorders, cordless power tools etc.)
International & UK destinations - Allowed in the mail, with restrictions and packaging guidelines below:
- Damaged or recalled batteries or cells are not allowed.
- Each package must contain no more than four cells or two batteries installed in or connected to equipment/devices.
- The maximum net quantity of cells or batteries is 5kg per package.
- Watt-hour rating must not exceed 20Wh per cell or 100Wh per battery.
- Each cell and battery must be of a type proven to meet the requirements of each test in the UN Manual of Tests and Criteria, Part III, section 38.3.
- Batteries are subject to these tests irrespective of whether the cells of which they are composed have been so tested.
- Cells and batteries must be manufactured under a quality management programme as specified in the ICAO Technical Instructions for the Safe Transport of Dangerous Goods by Air.
- Any person preparing or offering cells or batteries with or in equipment for transport must receive adequate instruction on the requirements commensurate with their responsibilities.
- Cells and batteries must be protected against short circuit.
- The equipment containing cells or batteries must be packed in strong rigid packaging and must be secured against movement within the outer packaging and packed to prevent accidental activation.
- The sender's name and return address must be clearly visible on the outer packaging.
I guess they class powerbanks as bare batteries rather than a battery contained in a device like a mobile which is treated differently.Ive just tried to sell a powerbank on ebay and using RM for delivery, said its no longer accepting electronics/ batteries
Prohibited Items List
https://personal.help.royalmail.com...tricted-items---advice-for-personal-customers
Batteries including those sent with/without or connected to an electronic device
Electronic devices sent with or containing batteries (including mobile phones, digital cameras, etc) see Batteries
I see that RM are no longer accepting batteries of any kind and no electronics
so you can no longer post your mobile phone or your camera etc etc via RM
Ive just tried to sell a powerbank on ebay and using RM for delivery, said its no longer accepting electronics/ batteries
Prohibited Items List
https://personal.help.royalmail.com...tricted-items---advice-for-personal-customers
Batteries including those sent with/without or connected to an electronic device
Electronic devices sent with or containing batteries (including mobile phones, digital cameras, etc) see Batteries
To be the devils advocate here Jean-F, I would say 5x2.5cm is quite large. I can see how the confusion arose. Put it down to experience and thank you for providing the lesson for us to learn from.On the subject of Royal Mail rants, does this qualify?
Like most people, we sent out quite a few Christmas cards in the past couple of days, today 7 or 8 were returned to us.
They were all properly addressed, all with the correct postage, and should have gone to various addresses in U.K. and all over Europe, USA and Canada, BUT they all had very small, (5cm x 2.5cm) return address labels on the reverse side of the envelopes, placed as near as possible to the bottom of the envelope.
The only thing that I could think was that the mail goes through a machine that reads the addresses, and somehow the machine read the return addresses, and not the addresses that were correctly written on the front.
My wife crossed all the return addresses out on the little labels and re-mailed the cards, but the kicker was when I called Royal Mail to ask if the cards would now be delivered properly, I was told that as they’d already all been franked, the addressees might be asked to pay a surcharge!
That's really bad if royal mail's machines can't tell the front from the back and no human in the loop spotted the error!
To be the devils advocate here Jean-F, I would say 5x2.5cm is quite large. I can see how the confusion arose. Put it down to experience and thank you for providing the lesson for us to learn from.
You can't bamboozle me with your cavemen measuring system Jean-F. I totally take your point. Perhaps the digital font was prioritised over written text?Really?
Less than 2 inches x less than 1 inch on the rear and at the bottom of a 5.5 inch square envelope?
With the front fully covered by a written address and correct postage.
I didn’t think so, but your opinion is valid and always welcome.
You can't bamboozle me with your cavemen measuring system Jean-F. I totally take your point. Perhaps the digital font was prioritised over written text?
Also, thank you for putting a return to sender note at all. I have so many cards for previous occupants I'd love to foreward on or at least notify them that the intended recipient is no longer here (or have fun with this and state they're in prison or emigrated maybe).
On the subject of Royal Mail rants, does this qualify?
Like most people, we sent out quite a few Christmas cards in the past couple of days, today 7 or 8 were returned to us.
They were all properly addressed, all with the correct postage, and should have gone to various addresses in U.K. and all over Europe, USA and Canada, BUT they all had very small, (5cm x 2.5cm) return address labels on the reverse side of the envelopes, placed as near as possible to the bottom of the envelope.
The only thing that I could think was that the mail goes through a machine that reads the addresses, and somehow the machine read the return addresses, and not the addresses that were correctly written on the front.
My wife crossed all the return addresses out on the little labels and re-mailed the cards, but the kicker was when I called Royal Mail to ask if the cards would now be delivered properly, I was told that as they’d already all been franked, the addressees might be asked to pay a surcharge!
Did you have a customs declaration on the international ones?
I like a friendly joke, but try and think of a more apt one eh?