Soldato
- Joined
- 25 Nov 2005
- Posts
- 12,612
live with a prerecorded show
Russell Brand.
- Thread starter Von Smallhausen
- Start date
Looks like the floodgates have opened and the police are investigating more allegations, with an official investigation.
Sounds like there might be a lot more to this,
Russell Brand: Police receive further allegations against comedian
The Met will investigate claims of "non-recent" offences from London and elsewhere in the country.
www.bbc.co.uk
Sounds like there might be a lot more to this,
Last edited:
Looks like the floodgates have opened and the police are investigating more allegations, with an official investigation.
Russell Brand: Police receive further allegations against comedian
The Met will investigate claims of "non-recent" offences from London and elsewhere in the country.www.bbc.co.uk
Sounds like there might be a lot more to this,
It's like they had a story ready to go as soon as he broadcast.
Maybe wait for a committee to send a letter and then some American MAGA support to form. Then go after the deep state, media cabal, press judiciary overlords.
I'm guessing he won't mention this action by the Government since it doesn't match his narrative. Unlike a committee letter that doesn't actually ask to censor him this actually holds some weight
www.gov.uk
www.independent.co.uk
Media Advisory Notice: Russell Brand
The Attorney General confirms the requirement not to publish material which could prejudice any potential criminal investigation or prosecutions.
Times urges Attorney General to withdraw Russell Brand warning advisory
A column by Times senior writer Sean O’Neill argued that the warning from Victoria Prentis ‘has no basis in law’.
www.independent.co.uk
Man of Honour
Looks like the floodgates have opened and the police are investigating more allegations, with an official investigation.
Russell Brand: Police receive further allegations against comedian
The Met will investigate claims of "non-recent" offences from London and elsewhere in the country.www.bbc.co.uk
Sounds like there might be a lot more to this,
BBC News top story
You OK hun?
Yeah, the “they’s” have been waiting like fiends for Brand to post a YouTube video and boom another hit piece. They always do that..
Amazing how the useless Met go full on investigating if a media celebrity touched a few women up 20 years ago but are totally absent when it comes to your house being broken in to - but then you're not a celebrity.
Who remembers when Gerry Halliwell reported her house had been broken in to whilst she was out and the Met sent 5 cars round. The Met said "it is a standard response to a house break in " Much hilarity ensued.
If a few women made accusations of sexual impropriety 20 years ago involving some random ordinary guy the police would just laugh.
Who remembers when Gerry Halliwell reported her house had been broken in to whilst she was out and the Met sent 5 cars round. The Met said "it is a standard response to a house break in " Much hilarity ensued.
If a few women made accusations of sexual impropriety 20 years ago involving some random ordinary guy the police would just laugh.
Last edited:
Hardly 'amazing' is it?
Considering the scale of abuse that women face with zero hope of justice and the MET's recent scandals regarding women in particular there's no way they aren't investigating it as a matter of self-preservation.
Last edited:
Soldato
Truly bizarre and as much as I laugh at the idiots conspiracy theories, it's playing 100% in to that narrative IMO.I'm guessing he won't mention this action by the Government since it doesn't match his narrative. Unlike a committee letter that doesn't actually ask to censor him this actually holds some weight
Media Advisory Notice: Russell Brand
The Attorney General confirms the requirement not to publish material which could prejudice any potential criminal investigation or prosecutions.
Times urges Attorney General to withdraw Russell Brand warning advisory
A column by Times senior writer Sean O’Neill argued that the warning from Victoria Prentis ‘has no basis in law’.
Some legal analysis says this is being done under an interpretation of a term that was changed 40 years ago and is no longer valid and wondering what on earth they are doing.
Why this can't just follow a normal route, innocent until proven guilty, actually have the CPS confirm the case is being taken to court etc, and then normal media blackout etc.. We all want RB to be held responsible if he's doing anything illegal, in fact it's vital he is, but doing it this way seems very counter productive.
Should do an Alex Belfield, he crowed on for months prior to trial all ****-sure he was going to have his day in court.. he ended up in Jail..
Last edited:
I think the argument is, that because allegations have been made, even though a case is not yet active, (nobody has been arrested) it could be pending and in the process of discovery.
If the papers are publishing things about the case, it could amount to prejudice and affect the outcome of the case.
The argument now, is that nobody seems to know whether the common law for contempt of court actually applies here, a couple of barristers I follow are unsure.
I can see both sides of the argument.
If a bunch of women come forward claiming they were raped some time ago and the accused is named, the police have a lot of work to do, before they can make a decision whether to charge.
If in the meantime the gutter press is going mental publishing stories and information about the accused, creating prejudices and filling the public with opinions - if the police decide to charge, the accused wouldn’t get a fair trial.
He wouldn’t get a fair trial, because any jury would have been potentially unfairly prejudiced against him, by the actions of the press, leading up to the trial.
Soldato
I follow the logic they are applying, but it's just unprecedented isn't it?
But a good point that I may have conflated the committee letter intention.. A good point that this might be more in RB's favour, not that any side should be favoured, but if allegations are made in the media, he has some rights to refute them publicly as well until things progress to him being charged etc.
I've just never seen this happen before, but actually if this was a move to thwart trial by media grossly against RB, then perhaps it's warranted.. the truth needs to come out, but in a court..
Last edited:
Asks if he is being silenced, whilst loudly babbling on the world's most viewed platform....which he gets to use for free.
What a clown.
Last edited:
Almost feel pity for his viewers considering he's insulting them constantly, but I imagine some of them probably like being dominated by feminine men.
Quite curious is the absence of recent allegations. Russell must be a changed man that gave up his promiscuous life and must now lead a peaceful life guided by god.
Or they are betting he hasn't kept any receipts that go back 20 years. Allegations of this kind 99% of the time face a spectacular and hilarious collapse when men show their receipts.
Or they are betting he hasn't kept any receipts that go back 20 years. Allegations of this kind 99% of the time face a spectacular and hilarious collapse when men show their receipts.
Soldato
I'm abit suspicious that at least the Rumble aspect is shady.
Rumble is being portrayed like it's some little company yet it's backers are unusual.
One of the main backers of Rumble is Dan Bongino, a guy who as served in the US secret service for 10 years+. Is a special agent ever retired?
Then the other two big backers are BlackRock, and Vanguard.
en.m.wikipedia.org
en.m.wikipedia.org
They are two of the richest companies in the US, maybe the world. Combined they might be bigger than Alphabet, the parent company of Google.
Rumble is being portrayed like it's some little company yet it's backers are unusual.
One of the main backers of Rumble is Dan Bongino, a guy who as served in the US secret service for 10 years+. Is a special agent ever retired?
Then the other two big backers are BlackRock, and Vanguard.
BlackRock - Wikipedia
The Vanguard Group - Wikipedia
They are two of the richest companies in the US, maybe the world. Combined they might be bigger than Alphabet, the parent company of Google.
Soldato
No matter what he says, all I hear is "I love me, I love me.".
Last edited:
Soldato
More government overreach as the attorney general says be careful about talking about the case or we risk being in contempt of court, despite no legal proceedings happening against Brand. This law is usually only active during a court case, and only focused at journalists.
Why is our speech being stopped!?
Left wing group Novara Media highlights the issue.
youtu.be
Why is our speech being stopped!?
Left wing group Novara Media highlights the issue.
Something Weird Is Going On With The Russell Brand Allegations
Novara Live broadcasts every weekday from 6PM on YouTube and Twitch. Episodes of Downstream are released Sundays at 6PM on YouTube. _________________________...
youtu.be