'Russia is seriously running out of cash'

Permabanned
Joined
26 Jun 2016
Posts
151
Dunno if it was a joke but I actually read something once on a project for steam powered T-72s.

Just shows really in what great shape the glorious Russian army is in. Hurr Durr!!

Soon we'll see projects for replacing tanks with bears altogether :rolleyes::D
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,696
Just shows really in what great shape the glorious Russian army is in. Hurr Durr!!

Soon we'll see projects for replacing tanks with bears altogether :rolleyes::D

Russians have a strange sense of humour so I'm not sure if it was something they thought amusing/trolling or actually serious.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
8,027
Location
Stoke/Norfolk
You see that green vest on the "elite flying Ivan" in the Syria??? They are so pathetic and poor that they can not afford a proper specialized uniform for the "Elite" Air-Force.

Imagine if thats the best of the best, how crap is everything else?.

:rolleyes:

Alternatively here's a different opinion - He's a pilot, he flies the SU-25SM, he doesn't need a specially "desert" coloured assault vest when his woodland camouflage does exactly the same job and it's what he would wear 90% of the time in Russia. So why spend extra money on desert coloured kit that makes no difference to a pilot.

PS Going by your logic the RAF, USAF, USMC and virtually every Air Force in the world etc are also crap because they can't afford a "Specialised Uniform" and wear green vets - despite spending 20 years in the military I'm still amazed at the retarded stuff that people, who clearly know nothing about the military (of any nation), post about it :D

RAF

evoleisamoron01.jpg


US Air Force

evoleisamoron02.jpg


RAF

evoleisamoron03.jpg


US Marine Corp

evoleisamoron04.jpg


US Navy

evoleisamoron07.jpg


Australian Army

evoleisamoron06.jpg


French Air Force

evoleisamoron05.jpg


I mean I could go on and post more but are you starting to see your mistake now?
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,696
If they are too cash strapped for tactical equipment for their elite pilots then how come they managed to kit out 20,000+ in complimentary battledress for the "invasion" of Crimea including updated new camo - albeit only the specialist units were in EMR and many of the regulars had 1980s body armour.
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jun 2007
Posts
68,785
Location
Wales
%D0%A0%D0%BE%D1%81%D0%B8%D0%B9%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B5-%D0%BB%D0%B5%D1%82%D1%87%D0%B8%D0%BA%D0%B8-%D0%B2-%D0%A1%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%B8%D0%B8-2.jpg

You see that green vest on the "elite flying Ivan" in the Syria??? They are so pathetic and poor that they can not afford a proper specialized uniform for the "Elite" Air-Force.

Imagine if thats the best of the best, how crap is everything else?

Russia's military is one big bohoo.


And ameica and the uk have large numbers of troops buying thier own boots.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
:rolleyes:

Alternatively here's a different opinion - He's a pilot, he flies the SU-25SM, he doesn't need a specially "desert" coloured assault vest when his woodland camouflage does exactly the same job and it's what he would wear 90% of the time in Russia. So why spend extra money on desert coloured kit that makes no difference to a pilot.

PS Going by your logic the RAF, USAF, USMC and virtually every Air Force in the world etc are also crap because they can't afford a "Specialised Uniform" and wear green vets - despite spending 20 years in the military I'm still amazed at the retarded stuff that people, who clearly know nothing about the military (of any nation), post about it :D

RAF

evoleisamoron01.jpg


US Air Force

evoleisamoron02.jpg


RAF

evoleisamoron03.jpg


US Marine Corp

evoleisamoron04.jpg


US Navy

evoleisamoron07.jpg


Australian Army

evoleisamoron06.jpg


French Air Force

evoleisamoron05.jpg


I mean I could go on and post more but are you starting to see your mistake now?

Their shoulderpads are awful small for elite units. If World of Warcraft has taught me anything about the military, it's that the more badass you are, the bigger your shoulderpads.

Also they should be packing gold chains, wrap-around shades, maybe a cool top hat or black, knee-high leather boots.

Yeah I'm guessing those guys are just grunts. No, not guessing. It's just common sense, man. If you're an elite flyer you're going to want lots of gold all over your person.
 
Commissario
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
33,099
Location
Panting like a fiend
If they are too cash strapped for tactical equipment for their elite pilots then how come they managed to kit out 20,000+ in complimentary battledress for the "invasion" of Crimea including updated new camo - albeit only the specialist units were in EMR and many of the regulars had 1980s body armour.

I may be wrong, but I suspect uniforms etc tend to be very much finite lifespan items that typically have to be replaced on a semi regular basis, it's pretty much a consumable that you can't really manage without*, unlike say ammo for training, spare parts for most of your vehicles to allow for more than essential training and operations.
They're also far cheaper than say a replacement engine for a jet fighter, or even just the maintenance on one after it's been out for training.

I don't know if it's still true, but not that long ago the Russian Airforce was from memory barely managing to keep the aircraft serviced enough to allow it's pilots to keep up to date on their flying hours, let alone full training and large scale exercises.




*Your troops have to wear something. (and it looks good in parades to have them wearing the same uniforms).
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,696
Yup - just funny if they "can't afford" a couple of different relatively inexpensive chest rigs for a small number of "top" pilots to suit different theatres yet are kitting out tens of thousands in a new mission specific camo.
 
Associate
Joined
7 May 2006
Posts
1,965
One thing that history has taught us is that special forces and top units rushing forward and attacking while the dull mass of the army follow behind it can be very effective. That being said I would say that Russia don't have the ability to do that in the proxy style wars. Nor the money to fund such a direct invasion.

But what do I know I'm sat here my OCUK general hat on and making out I know what I'm talking about.

*loads command and conquer red 2*
 
Soldato
Joined
8 Apr 2009
Posts
12,702
Considering the Russian planes perform so well in impartial tests (eg the Indian Airforce ones) then it shouldn't be an issue anyway!

Plus equipment this and equipment that the simple fact is no large modern army could occupy and hold hostile territory anymore people largely don't have that brutality in them anymore unless they have direct religious zeal or are grown in tanks and brainwashed like the North Koreans.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,696
It's not mission specific. It's a standard multi theatre camo.

I'm no expert but I believe the forces that took Crimea are in a mixture of an updated version of one of the Partizan camo variants and a few in EMR neither of which is in common use and their configuration was specifically generic without normal insignia, etc.
 
Caporegime
Joined
23 Dec 2011
Posts
32,948
Location
Northern England
I'm no expert but I believe the forces that took Crimea are in a mixture of an updated version of one of the Partizan camo variants and a few in EMR neither of which is in common use and their configuration was specifically generic without normal insignia, etc.

Yup. The insignias are all velcro on patches though. The uniform is completely interchangeable between all units and ranks. You just attach your insignias to the appropriate spot.

Or don't...as the case may be.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,696
Yup. The insignias are all velcro on patches though. The uniform is completely interchangeable between all units and ranks. You just attach your insignias to the appropriate spot.

Or don't...as the case may be.

Yeah I'm aware of how that works - just pointing out for those forces they specifically went with a generic looking setup without using a lot of normal stuff. Though the AK74Ms, etc. are a bit of a give away lol. What is kind of weird is how many of them have 80s era body armour that looks pristine, new and in good condition - just how much stuff do they have in surplus :S
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
16 Aug 2009
Posts
7,830
Love how they use the words "communist dictator" for an elected president. From a supposedly unbiased professional news outlet (CNN). I'm no fan of Putin but c'mon, this is blatant misinformation.

Funny how we love to spread lies about people we don't like very much. Elect a government in Egypt that we don't like? Support a military coup that overthows them.

One thing that history has taught us is that special forces and top units rushing forward and attacking while the dull mass of the army follow behind it can be very effective.

Hitler thought attacking Russia would be a cakewalk too and look where that got him! There are a lot of russians.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
13 Nov 2013
Posts
4,294
Love how they use the words "communist dictator" for an elected president. From a supposedly unbiased professional news outlet (CNN). I'm no fan of Putin but c'mon, this is blatant misinformation.

Funny how we love to spread lies about people we don't like very much. Elect a government in Egypt that we don't like? Support a military coup that overthows them.

The West condemned the military coup in Egypt.
 
Caporegime
Joined
29 Jan 2008
Posts
58,931
I wonder how much money, money that could be used for better things, Putin spends on his military willy waving.

Lots, but the same could be said for a lot of countries. How you view it depends on your stance on the importance of military power.

Not to the same extent, not by a long way really. Saudi, UAE and say North Korea are the main ones to exceed Russia re: spending as a % of GDP. Though two of them can afford it regardless.
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,696
Not to the same extent, not by a long way really. Saudi, UAE and say North Korea are the main ones to exceed Russia re: spending as a % of GDP. Though two of them can afford it regardless.

He doesn't really have a lot of choice - can't exactly ignore NATO troop build up on the borders, etc.
 
Commissario
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
33,099
Location
Panting like a fiend
IIRC the NATO "troop build up" is in two forms.
Troops who have been there for decades, or on routine exercises that have gone on for decades at regular intervals, and those that have been moved there because of what has happened in the Ukraine, and the Russian activity along the borders of Nato countries (was it Sweden that has increased it's Garrison on one of it's islands after a large number of suspicious Russian "tourists" started arriving?).
 
Back
Top Bottom