Ryse: Son of Rome GPU performance benchmark

Calin Banc · 10 Oct 2014 at 05:15

LambChop said:
Another convincing win ? Well when you optimise a game to run better on AMD isnt that going to be a bit obvious ? Let's optimise this game, so that it can top the charts.

And people wonder why I hate AMD

Aren't you going a little bit for a straw man here?

Silent_Scone · 10 Oct 2014 at 08:24

warren_1979 said:
Is this the game that busted Crytek?

Crytek didn't bust. I know someone who works at their Nottingham offices and they've been going through some administrative changes and shift arounds.

I would hardly call this game their finest hour though, but when are launch titles ever.

I think the best part about this game so far it seems is it might potentially add to the other two games in the sub forum that AMD cards do better in

*hides*

Rusty0611 · 10 Oct 2014 at 09:19

Tonester0011 said:
Wonder if Bug would have posted this news feed if AMD weren't clear winners lol.

Nope of course not

shankly1985 · 10 Oct 2014 at 13:26

Silent_Scone said:
Crytek didn't bust. I know someone who works at their Nottingham offices and they've been going through some administrative changes and shift arounds.

I would hardly call this game their finest hour though, but when are launch titles ever.

I think the best part about this game so far it seems is it might potentially add to the other two games in the sub forum that AMD cards do better in

*hides*

Dont forget the crazy amount of Overclocking the 980 has needed to get top at 1080p on the Aliens Bench.
Its up there by brute force.

Tonester0011 · 10 Oct 2014 at 13:56

shankly1985 said:
Dont forget the crazy amount of Overclocking the 980 has needed to get top at 1080p on the Aliens Bench.
Its up there by brute force.

shankly1985 · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:02

Tonester0011 said:

Would help if you read the link I quoted then you wouldn't be confused.

Gregster · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:02

shankly1985 said:
Dont forget the crazy amount of Overclocking the 980 has needed to get top at 1080p on the Aliens Bench.
Its up there by brute force.

Welcome to the world of overclocking on overclockers.co.uk. Weird how none of the GPUs are run at stock in a benching thread

Ayahuasca · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:02

shankly1985 said:
Dont forget the crazy amount of Overclocking the 980 has needed to get top at 1080p on the Aliens Bench.
Its up there by brute force.

lol they are like 23-28fps ahead, even a mild overclock would put it 15-20fps ahead.

People raving on about AMD winning Sniper Elite 3 benchmark by tiny amounts using mantle then not impressed when a 980 smashes AMD out the park with a 20+fps lead.

shankly1985 · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:03

Gregster said:
Welcome to the world of overclocking on overclockers.co.uk. Weird how none of the GPUs are run at stock in a benching thread

None? mine is there

shankly1985 · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:04

Ayahuasca said:
lol they are like 23-28fps ahead, even a mild overclock would put it 15-20fps ahead.

People raving on about AMD winning Sniper Elite 3 benchmark by tiny amounts using mantle then not impressed when a 980 smashes AMD out the park with a 20+fps lead.

What about 4k? where most gamer's are heading? or Sli why no Sli scores?

Ayahuasca · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:05

shankly1985 said:
What about 4k? where most gamer's are heading?

We'll all care about 4k when we arrive there, the majority of people don't use that res and won't for a good while, even you know that.

Probably why nvidia didn't see the need to cater their new cards for 4k as they know the amount of their market using it is tiny.

Tonester0011 · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:06

shankly1985 said:
Would help if you read the link I quoted then you wouldn't be confused.

I'm confused:

1. What link
2. What crazy overclocking??
3. The 980 is 20+FPS ahead of a 1270core 290x.

Gregster · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:06

shankly1985 said:
None? mine is there

1. Score 167.36 GPU 980 @1590/2000, CPU 3930k @5.1, Besty Link DX11 344.16 Drivers
2. Score 163.34 GPU 980 @1590/1970, CPU 5960X @4.7, stulid Link DX11 344.16 Drivers
3. Score 162.49 GPU 980 @1580/2100, CPU 5960X @4.35, Silent_Scone Link DX11 344.16 Drivers
4. Score 141.36 GPU nvTitan @1333/1879, CPU 3930k @4.625, Gregster Link DX11 344.11 Drivers
5. Score 140.64 GPU nvTitan @1293/1852, CPU 3930k @4.4, whyscotty Link DX11 344.11 Drivers
6. Score 139.68 GPU 290X @1270/1625, CPU 4930k @4.0, Kaapstad Link DX11 14.9 Drivers
7. Score 139.47 GPU 290X @1245/1625, CPU 3970X @4.9, AMDMatt Link DX11 14.9 Drivers
8. Score 136.68 GPU 970 @1588/1900, CPU 2500k @4.2, SieB Link DX11 344.16 Drivers
9. Score 132.31 GPU 290P @1285/1625, CPU 2600k @5.0, Uncle Petey Link DX11 14.9 Drivers
10. Score 120.79 GPU 290X @1080/1250, CPU 4790k @4.0, nashathedog Link DX11 14.9 Drivers
11. Score 116.34 GPU 290P @1030/1400, CPU 5960X @4.7, stulid Link DX11 14.9 Drivers
12. Score 104.52 GPU 290P @977/1250, CPU 2600k @3.5, shankly1985 Link DX11 14.9 Drivers

Yer, just seen you are at the very bottom. And Ayahuasca is spot on, you give it the biggen when AMD are in the lead and get all humpty when AMD lose. You shouldn't dish it if you can't take it

I thought you had a 290X?

TonyTurbo78 · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:07

I love how fanboys get so offended by the other brand...jesus guys

Ayahuasca · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:07

TonyTurbo78 said:
I love how fanboys get so offended by the other brand...jesus guys

Who's offended?

shankly1985 · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:08

Gregster said:
Yer, just seen you are at the very bottom. And Ayahuasca is spot on, you give it the biggen when AMD are in the lead and get all humpty when AMD lose. You shouldn't dish it if you can't take it

I thought you had a 290X?

I can take it you think i really care? lol Nope 290's

TonyTurbo78 · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:08

in general how you lot go back and forwards in these benchmarks, cant we all just get along lol.

Gregster · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:10

shankly1985 said:
I can take it you think i really care? lol

Yer I do, or you wouldn't have mentioned it.

TonyTurbo78 said:
I love how fanboys get so offended by the other brand...jesus guys

Only one guy I read getting all huffy about the other brand

Silent_Scone · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:10

shankly1985 said:
Dont forget the crazy amount of Overclocking the 980 has needed to get top at 1080p on the Aliens Bench.
Its up there by brute force.

What are you taking about? Most 980s will do at least 1500 core.

Shanks, take a timeout lol!

If anything is balls to the wall it is Pulse with his 1340 core. You cannot compare clocks across architectures. This has been covered so many times

Respectively 1340 core is as much as anyone will achieve on a 290x on water.
1500 to 1600 is with as little as 87mv whilst keeping within 175w TDP. You're not even scratching the surface with the 980. I'm bouncing off the power limit constantly.

Ayahuasca · 10 Oct 2014 at 14:11

TonyTurbo78 said:
in general how you lot go back and forwards in these benchmarks lol.

It's a benchmark thread, comments like yours which are completely off topic are even worse than people arguing about the topic.

I couldn't care less who's in the lead I just thought I'd make a point to shankly raving about winning one benchmark by a tiny amount then trying to discredit people in this one because they're running high overclocks, and to be perfectly honest I think we'll see 980's with higher overclocks than that when the classified arrives.