• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen "2" ?

nashathedog said:
The Firestrike result doesn't look anything special if that's what we can expect when using the 350 motherboards. :(


Here's my 1600x, https://www.3dmark.com/fs/14473698
Physics score is 17,820
Click to expand...

The same thought here as well. Although the mobo i think hasn't really got much to do with it. More than likely down to the user.
This was mine from a few months ago, a physics score of 20,447. Firestrike is one of those benchies though that just does not play well with Ryzen unless you are running it at 4K..............then it can easily mix it with the top Intel's

https://www.3dmark.com/fs/14995431
 
Zeed said:
Anyway more leaks 2600 this time

https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-5-2600-cpu-benchmarks-overclock-tests-leak/
Click to expand...
Cache bandwidths are lower than in LOLN1's results or even in some results of 1800X I could find.
Though latencies are in same ballpark.
Well, wouldn't be wonder if say Ryzen 1 mobos don't yet have best BIOS support for Ryzen 2.



gavinh87 said:
On that note wheres my money!?
Click to expand...
Now how many cane strikes to back that payment was?
Would hundred be enough?
 
kitfit1 said:
The same thought here as well. Although the mobo i think hasn't really got much to do with it. More than likely down to the user.
This was mine from a few months ago, a physics score of 20,447. Firestrike is one of those benchies though that just does not play well with Ryzen unless you are running it at 4K..............then it can easily mix it with the top Intel's

https://www.3dmark.com/fs/14995431
Click to expand...

I'm not sure what to expect now, A small leap due to the clocks it seems.
 
I must admit i'l be disappointed if you cant get the max turbo speed on all cores with a bit of overclocking, Yes i know ryzen 1 you often couldnt but i was hoping with a year of tinkering and a shrink to 12nm that would have been sorted.
 
To the guy with the 4690k who wants to upgrade but needs good single core performance.

I would still consider coffee lake, I went from my 4670k to the 8600k, and single threaded stuff is much snappier, and single threaded games also perform noticeably better.

I ran bench's on passmark (which tests individual parts of the system), the raw cpu processing performance was up about circa 25% due to IPC improvements and an extra 500mhz clock speed (4.3 on my haswell, 4.8 on my CL) but there was massive gains in RAM (ddr4 vs ddr3) and cache performance, more than doubling of performance in both areas. This also combined with the 2 extra cores has my multi core performance close to double over my 4670k as a bonus.

Its also reflected here

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-8600K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-4670K/3941vs1538
 
chrcoluk said:
To the guy with the 4690k who wants to upgrade but needs good single core performance.

I would still consider coffee lake, I went from my 4670k to the 8600k, and single threaded stuff is much snappier, and single threaded games also perform noticeably better.

I ran bench's on passmark (which tests individual parts of the system), the raw cpu processing performance was up about circa 25% due to IPC improvements and an extra 500mhz clock speed (4.3 on my haswell, 4.8 on my CL) but there was massive gains in RAM (ddr4 vs ddr3) and cache performance, more than doubling of performance in both areas. This also combined with the 2 extra cores has my multi core performance close to double over my 4670k as a bonus.

Its also reflected here

http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-8600K-vs-Intel-Core-i5-4670K/3941vs1538
Click to expand...


Perhaps you should post that in a new thread - my wonderful singled threaded 8600k.

This is RYZEN "2"
 
iakhtar said:
Those firestrike scores are terrible :/
Click to expand...
This is the problem
the frequency does not go beyond 3450 mhz


I thank Gibbo, it allows me to put my tests
thanks also to the staff of ocuk
sorry if sometimes I write incorrectly
P.S Maybe in the afternoon arrives other cpu 2700x
My cpu is not the one used by the Spanish reviewer
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom