-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ryzen "2" ?
- Thread starter beany_bot
- Start date
Other forums, so don't stand over people in this thread announcing your readiness to jump on them, do that in those other forums.
https://videocardz.com/75797/first-previews-of-ryzen-7-2700x-are-here
spanish review
https://elchapuzasinformatico.com/2018/04/amd-ryzen-7-2700x-review/
negatives–
Memories do not end up going fine, at least for now
Little ability to overclock <---- expected this
I cannot understand how these morons keep getting chips first, there is something seriously wrong and still they relase "review".
Pretty sure you were one of them suggesting 4.5ghz tbh lol.
I haven't jumped on anyone, I'm sat here smiling lol. It was actually you that jumped on me but w/e
If they can hit 4.3 on all cores and/or do some fancy boost setting that will stretch AMD's lead pretty far.
Pretty sure you can't remember what you had for breakfast and are just here to wind people up.
Went to the weatherspoons and had a mixed grill. Was quite nice.
It was this very forum lol
I cannot understand how these morons keep getting chips first, there is something seriously wrong and still they relase "review".
They are all running on last gen BIOS, until there are Ryzen 2### BIOS in these 300 series boards or 400 series motherboards they should all be taken with a handfull of salt.
The only people who did testing on 400 series boards are CanardPC and they didn't publish those result reasoning the 400 series board were "cheating" whatever that means.
You know you've long lost all credibility and people just tolerate you?
Mixed grill for breakfast eh. Needs a special mention.
Again, let me stop you right there, i never said that at all.
It's dodgy to releases stuff early. Even worse to then draw conclusions from tests.
Yeah, and that's the other thing, its how you can tell the difference between good tech journalists and those trying to stir emotions up to gain clicks, in which case its a good idea not to believe anything they say anyway.
as always people dont even read or know nothing and start flame LOL.
Guess they dont remember how bad it was for first 1-2 months when ryzen came out and hynix would not pass 2933 no matter what settings/kits lol.
I think looks goof for beta unfinished bios ect
19'th.
That's inevitable on a brand new platform, Intel X99 had exactly the same issues with DDR4.
I'm not saying this launch will be perfect but its not a new platform anymore.
If Ryzen was locked to 2400Mhz I'd have still bought it.
Can't come soon enough.
X99 still has problems TBH. Even bigger problems now Intels chips are b0rked.
Looks at sig, checks out.
@gavinh87
The Conversation in full.
Yup, it would be good
2700X = 3.9 to 4.35Ghz Boost... close enough.
Don't start with that ####.
