** SAPPHIRE R290 PRO REVIEW & 1000+ IN STOCK!! **

these are a steal great value here even more so in 3-6 months ones the game bundles and 10-20% price drops come into play after the first rush. A pair of these with blocks and change compared to a titan is great well done amd im amazed at these things, however wont be buying, twin 670s still keeping up with these at 1080 my next buy will be a 144hz screen and will wait to see what q4 2014 brings

The game bundles are included already by the looks of it (on OCUK at least). No game update by AMD yet though :(.

I think the deciding factor for me will be price difference between R9 280X and R9 290 when I get around to upgrading my graphics card after christmas.
 
HI there

Disabled ULPS, got the office to freezing levels and re-ran at 1240/6400 :D

fmln.png
 
Trying to order now! :D

But my card is failing due to security reasons.... Blarg Nationwide y u do this :( Hopefully they will be still around once I finish work so I can sort out my card!
 
Any CF results as this is where its going to be at for most of us on here!

What is the difference between 2 x 780, 2 x Titan, 2 x 290 and 2 x 290X and then 2 x 780Ti.

Once I've got that info I'm going to get buying, should be available in a couple of days I'd expect!
 
I'm still not ecstatic about my GPU running at 90C 24/7 and I'm definitely not going back to a wind turbine level of noise from a graphics card in my system.

A little cheating from AMD imo in that department - be interesting to know how fast a 780 would be if it was allowed to run that hot?
 
I'm still not ecstatic about my GPU running at 90C 24/7 and I'm definitely not going back to a wind turbine level of noise from a graphics card in my system.

A little cheating from AMD imo in that department - be interesting to know how fast a 780 would be if it was allowed to run that hot?


What an odd comment.

Do you realise you could run a 780 with the fans set to minimum, it will soon get upto 90c when under-load, especially overclocked and would not clock as far as it would when running cooler at say sub 80c.

All cards the same, cool them better, the further they clock.

So actually the question should be, wonder what core clocks an R290 would hit if the GPU temperature was maintained sub 60c, of course higher.

All cards the same, cool them more, they clock higher.

Titan and 780Ti also run pretty hot, they will see 80-90c under gaming quite easily, so AMD is not alone in hot running on these cards with big cores and lots of processing power.
 
What an odd comment.

Do you realise you could run a 780 with the fans set to minimum, it will soon get upto 90c when under-load, especially overclocked and would not clock as far as it would when running cooler at say sub 80c.

All cards the same, cool them better, the further they clock.

So actually the question should be, wonder what core clocks an R290 would hit if the GPU temperature was maintained sub 60c, of course higher.

All cards the same, cool them more, they clock higher.

Titan and 780Ti also run pretty hot, they will see 80-90c under gaming quite easily, so AMD is not alone in hot running on these cards with big cores and lots of processing power.

What an odd reply.

You do realise a reference 780 can be clocked to 1200mhz using the reference cooler, and maintain sub 75 degrees at less than 49 DB. The 290 and 290X cannot do that with their reference cooler, because they throttle at stock clocks already, and sound like a plasma heated dyson hoover. There is no headroom unless you buy a new cooler or watercool it. Which would then take the card to the same price point as a 780.

I'm happy to provide proof for all of this, screenshots and scores alike. I've been through 3 780's in the last few months, two reference, one windforce 3x OC, and had both reference under water for benchmarking with full cover EK blocks.

All that being said, nobody would buy a 780 now until the price drops again to realign with AMD, but anyone with a 780 or Titan would have to be insane to sell up and buy these instead, unless they intend to watercool. The Magnesium alloy reference cooler is far superior.
 
In some regards, this month is going to be fun, in others.. ARGHHH! so now I've got to wait for the end of the month, and its either a 780, or this, along with a new monitor (since it seems R290 doesn't support non-dvi monitors running on adapters like my old heap o' junk)
 
What an odd reply.

You do realise a reference 780 can be clocked to 1200mhz using the reference cooler, and maintain sub 75 degrees at less than 49 DB. The 290 and 290X cannot do that with their reference cooler, because they throttle at stock clocks already, and sound like a plasma heated dyson hoover. There is no headroom unless you buy a new cooler or watercool it. Which would then take the card to the same price point as a 780.

I'm happy to provide proof for all of this, screenshots and scores alike. I've been through 3 780's in the last few months, two reference, one windforce 3x OC, and had both reference under water for benchmarking with full cover EK blocks.

All that being said, nobody would buy a 780 now until the price drops again to realign with AMD, but anyone with a 780 or Titan would have to be insane to sell up and buy these instead, unless they intend to watercool. The Magnesium alloy reference cooler is far superior.

So explain how I got 1200Mhz core then with the reference cooler with ZERO throttling? All benchmarkers run with fans at 100% when going for maximum overclock, as such with the fan at such speeds and card clocked to 1200MHz it remains sub 85c. At stock clocks it is very easy to keep an R290X from throttling, you just set a GPU temp limit of 90c and set the fan maximum fan speed of 60%, this keeps it both quiet/reasonable and prevents throttling.

I don't need you to provide me any proof, I was overclocking champion 10 years ago, in short I know what I am doing, 8 Pack even more so. Just like I can run 780's at 1300MHz on their stock cooler if the silicon is good, again with fans at 100%, which is also loud, just not as loud as AMD.

I don't understand why you want to show me screenshots? I know what 780's and every other card on the market can do, I've tested them all.

I've water-cooled 780's, they can achieve upto 1400MHz core in such circumstances again with good silicon and the R290's can manage 1300Mhz, both cards in complete silence and at these max levels the R290 still edges it.

So I am a little confused as to what you want to prove to me? I've already done it!

Of course I agree if you have a 780, its only a sidestep upgrade and simply not worthwhile, at no point have I suggested anyone with a 780 change to a R290, that would just be pointless.

On prices 780's won't move again, NVIDIA sales have exploded with the new price points, VGA sales in general are at the highest we've seen them in years, if not outperforming all previous records, seems to me current pricing set by AMD and NVIDIA is spot on, the sales speak volumes of such.

You do realise as well when you say buying an R290, then a waterblock brings it to same price point, difference being the R290 would have a big performance advantage and be quieter.

Right now we are testing 780GHz and 780Ti and clocking them, to add to the results, were world champions here, myself holding 3D Mark 2001 title from some years ago and 8Pack with multiple titles, we know exactly what were doing. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom