Amazing, i think the Conservatives are just waiting til its SO bad, that they are forced to sell it.
It's incredible, the Tories have dug themselves into such a hole by banging on and on for 5 years about "cutting the deficit" that the best they can do is "ring-fence" NHS spending (i.e. decrease it in real terms) rather than fund it to the level it needs.
Isn't it ironic that the NHS will eventually go the way Americas health care once was. Yet Obama has made theirs what ours is currently. Without the extreme mess, given time.
[/QUOTE]
Stuck in another dimension... nothing changes on that front.
It's incredible, the Tories have dug themselves into such a hole by banging on and on for 5 years about "cutting the deficit" that the best they can do is "ring-fence" NHS spending (i.e. decrease it in real terms) rather than fund it to the level it needs.
If our population do NOTHING to improve their own situation, by increasing levels of obesity, diabetes, tooth decay and various other illnesses that are for the most part avoidable, exactly when do you think we should draw a line, and stop increasing the funding to a lumbering inefficient beast of an organisation?
the biggest issue for the NHS is old people and our ageing population
...and if they were fitter from earlier, then there wouldn't be as much of an issue, I see it every day, the fat older woman, barely able to walk needing new hips and still carrying too much weight.
We won't live forever and if we do many of us end up in a dementia based mess, truly would consider the dignitas option if that occurred to me, but unfortunately by that stage, one simply couldn't consent.
Anyway, as I have said before, we need an entire change in the NHS not from within and not from politicians, social care, healthcare, mental health and provision of front line service should all be taken as a single unit. A 15 then 30 year plan, with a basis for how we go about funding it, including the educational provision for staff training from within the country.
We price it up, we tell people what it would achieve, we then cost it, tell people what would be provided and for what cost. Then we have a referendum and let people pick a or b, a the fully costed plan for the future, and the likely hood of a tax increase to fund it. Or b, a smaller provides less service, which you supplement with private health insurance.
We can't have both for nothing.
Simon Stevens' journey is well known. He left the NHS in 2004 and spent a decade learning how the American’s do healthcare at US giant, UnitedHealth (at first Stevens was put on selling UnitedHealth services to European health systems, then became Vice President and lobbyist for the whole UH Group). Stevens was described in the Financial Times as “a key architect, along with Mr Milburn and Mr Blair – to whom he went on to serve as health adviser – of the reforms that for the first time broke up the NHS monolith, introducing privately run treatment centres.”
In 2014 Stevens returned to the UK to share his wisdom as Chief Executive Officer of the NHS. He is the man currently running the show.
Maybe less well-known is that Milburn’s private secretary, Tony Sampson, was also drawn to UnitedHealth. From 2005 to 2013, Steven’s former close colleague was UnitedHealth’s chief lobbyist in the UK.
What’s hardly known at all is that Milburn’s other aide, Andrew Harrison, has also long been in the employ of UnitedHealth. Harrison is head of health at lobbying firm Hanover, which has lobbied for UnitedHealth since at least 2007.
So, that’s the whole team – Stevens, Sampson, and Harrison – all lobbying for UnitedHealth for the best part of a decade.
And today we’re surprised that UnitedHealth is in line to pick up billion pound NHS contracts?
Isn't it ironic that the NHS will eventually go the way Americas health care once was. Yet Obama has made theirs what ours is currently. Without the extreme mess, given time.