JohnnyG said:So he wanted to sue you for loss of earnings (fair enough) but when it transpired that there would be no loss of earnings he didn't pursue it?
Well he couldn't really pursure it as he hadn't really lost any money.
JohnnyG said:So he wanted to sue you for loss of earnings (fair enough) but when it transpired that there would be no loss of earnings he didn't pursue it?
Phate said:Driving outside of your ability generally means you don't have 100% control of the car.
Wrecklessness is driving at 90 through a 30 zone and not giving a toss about who else is on the road - which I can do with complete control of the car (but obviously I don't)- that is driving wrecklessly.
What's the problem then?Phate said:Well he couldn't really pursure it as he hadn't really lost any money.
Phate said:hmmm - I disagree.
As I said - I can quite easily drive my car with full control at stupid speeds round the local 30 zones as I know the roads very well - I would put a greater risk to everyone around me who isn't driving wrecklessly from overtakes etc.
Driving outside my ability however, that would be something like drifting round a sharp corner on wet tarmac in a FWD car - considering I've never done any driving like that that's when I would be outside of my ability and what the car does is luck.
trojan698 said:As I said earlier, how would you know why his employer didn't renew his contract, they wouldn't admit it was because he'd been on the sick, it would look bad if they did. Also, bad backs are the oldest excuse going so they might've even thought he was taking the ****.
JohnnyG said:What's the problem then?

Phate said:His employer said they weren't going to renew his contract as he wasn't good at the job.
Phate said:Because I'm not uncertain.
Most people would probably not drop a friend after injuring them in a car accident and getting the hump when their friend tries to claim compensation for lack of earnings due to the injury they caused, especially when the friend stops claiming when he finds out he hasn't lost anything.Phate said:There isn't one.
I asked what other people have done when faced with the same decision.
Surfer said:ok now we know a little more..
You're the driver so you have a responsibility to everyone else in the car. (or was it involving his car as well? racing each other? or smt?)
Even if your insurers dont pay up (did you instruct them to admit liability or anything? because youve accepted that the accident was your fault) you should at least compensate him in some way.
You've accepted it was your fault so you're responsible and owe him some sort of compensastion surely? You cant just go "awww lets just forget about it m8 cheers"
cleanbluesky said:Then why do you require the input of others? What value is it to you?
Phate said:No - as I've said he was a passenger in my car.
Whilst I see what your saying it was an accident at the end of the day. Nobody knows when they are going to happen, we do as much as possible to prevent them but they do happen.
Plus after he claimed compensation and got complete jack if he hadn't of been a complete spangle about the whole thing and sent his parents round threatening me then maybe we would still be on talking terms.
If he hadn't of come across the whole thing with such an attitude (I had to ring the police as he was threatening me over text) then I would have offered to help.

Surfer said:Ahh things are making sense now. It sounds like you were driving just a little bit fast but nothing reckless. An unavoidable accident happens. (would it have happened if you were driving slower?) And now he is blaming you for his hardship and even threatening you etc.
Now if you were driving recklessly, on drunk/drugs etc and he was screaming for you to stop the car because he was fearing for his life but you ignored him and just laughed at him and then the accident occured then he is entitled to pursue you for a ton of damages.![]()

Phate said:As said - curious.
I'm bored and I was wondering - all there is to it.
cleanbluesky said:Yes, and as I said, why be curious...
We all know what happens to curious cats.cleanbluesky said:Yes, and as I said, why be curious...

Sounds like he was being a royal **** to me, sueing you personally for his own gratification, putting you through the ordeal of court and trying to take money of you that wasnt owed to him. Those are not the actions of someone who should be given a second chance. If any of my friends did this I would never talk to them again.Phate said:Well he couldn't really pursure it as he hadn't really lost any money.
)and have lived by it since:I have enough friends that I don't have to bother with people I can't trust.Friends are like parachutes - if they aren't there when you need them, you'll never need them again.