Soldato
Really? There’s arguments going on about a made up argument the op and ‘friend’ had?
Jesus wept.
Jesus wept.
See what grammar you yourself are using automatically...'a' third...'a' quarter.We are not really talking grammatically, we are talking about mathematically.
Half in maths is a number. The way it is written, By Half, is by 0.5. Like by a third is by 1/3. Or by a quarter is 1/4.
Your 2nd and 3rd sentences don't belong in this thread, it is a completely different topic.
Really? There’s arguments going on about a made up argument the op and ‘friend’ had?
Jesus wept.
Actually, assuming all numbers integers. Then 200/0.5 would give a divide by zero error and the add 30 would be left hanging. What's that? half is obviously meant to interpreted as a floating point number? Where does it say that in the question?
Entirely for comedic purposes obviouslyWhy would you assume all numbers are integers?!
See what grammar you yourself are using automatically...'a' third...'a' quarter.
No-one ever says half on its own in maths without a qualifier. One half, or 'a' half are valid, 'half' by itself is not valid.
0.5 is not 'half', it is 'a half' or 'one half'.
When you say above 'by half' that is the whole problem with the question in the first place. If the question said 'by a half' it would be clear that 'a half' is 0.5. However 'by half' is not a number because 'half' by itself is not a number.
'Half' used on its own is a predeterminer, its not numerical. Its an instruction or describing word.
So for example 'half a chicken' is valid, or to say divide something 'in half', meaning divide something into two equal parts.
'Half' on its own is a describing word, not a number. So to say 'divide by half' is as nonsense as saying 'divide by all', or 'divide by both'.
‘A’ third.I would do the same if it had said divide by a third
It however says by half, which taken as it is written, it's / 0.5
I would do the same if it had said divide by a third,
You need the ‘a’ to remove ambiguity.You need the 'a' in there to make it numerical.
look at your own language here Raymond.
'by half'.
'by A third'..
You wouldn't say 'divide by third', so why would you say 'divide by half'?
You need the 'a' in there to make it numerical.
Nothing right about it eitherNothing wrong in version without S
No, because it’s grammatically incorrect and open to ambiguity.Do you ever hear "divide by quarter"
Isn't that exactly my point?Because they are different, and thus written differently.
Nobody says divide by a half. why don't you ask the same question, instead of use third, replace it with "quarter."
Do you ever hear "divide by quarter"
Isn't that exactly my point?
People do say 'divide by A half'...in maths. And yes of course people say 'divide by a quarter' or a fifth, or a seventh. (or you can use 'one' instead i.e one quarter).
The original question isn't valid because 'half' is not a number in the sentence as written.
You see it all the time with other words, like Northerners use was when they should use were.