Shark Attack - your thoughts?

[Glaucus]

One bird doesnt make a flock

It doesn't need to, it shows that learned behaviour is a natural thing for survival and not just a human trait. Therefore all your arguments about needing tools or learning to swim, go out the window and are pointless. As other animals clearly do it.

 

[Nvidiot]

it shows that learned behaviour is a natural thing .

Strange, earlier in this thread you said it was taught.

 

[Glaucus]

Strange, earlier in this thread you said it was taught.

It is taught, it's still natural.

Where you are saying no animal needs learned behaviour to survive and as such learned behaviur is not natural. Which I proved you wrong with a backed up scientific study. It is both learnt and natural.

 

[Nvidiot]

It is taught, it's still natural.

Where you are saying no animal needs learned behaviour to survive and as such learned behaviur is not natural. Which I proved you wrong with a backed up scientific study. It is both learnt and natural.

I said it before, turtles dont need any taught behavior, neither do many other species to swim without needing to be learned.

OH, P.S, wheres my insult I gave you?

 

[Glaucus]

I said it before, turtles dont need any taught behavior, neither do many other species to swim without needing to be learned.

Again it makes no difference. Some animals do, that bird species and us.
Your turtle doesn't show or prove anything.

 

[Fuzz]

UNSUBSCRIBES

The mindless drivel in this thread is unbearable..

 

[Nvidiot]

Your turtle doesn't show or prove anything.

Afraid it does it shows that most things are "instinctive" and not learnt

 

[Glaucus]

Afraid it does it shows that most things are "instinctive" and not learnt

Oh god that's it I'm out.

You have a total inability to reason and thought process. Or more likely just being an idiot, especially when you use that smiley and looking to bait.

Things are considered natural if animals other than humans do it. Other animals have learning abilities and need them to survive. It doesn't make one ounce of difference how wide spread it is or the lack there off. if it happens in nature it's natural. Therefor birds needing learned behaviour to survive makes it natural. You showing other animals can survive with no learned behaviour is neither here nor there and means exactly diddly squat. As you entire argument is based on that. It is all wrong and pointless. Combine that about your total lack of knowledge on human evolution and we have an endless argument where you won't admit your wrong.

 

[Nvidiot]

You showing other animals can survive with no learned behaviour is neither here nor there and means exactly diddly squat. As you entire argument is based on that. It is all wrong and pointless.

Just like that you decided not to bring anything to the table for food for thought.

The whole question you presented was humans are "naturally" at home on the water as land, but its only you that thinks this, so by that reasoning cant you see that maybe (bare with me here) your wrong?

 

[Glaucus]

The whole question you presented was humans are "naturally" at home on the water as land, ?

that was never ever the question at hand.
And if you had bothered reading anything, you would know that.

 

[Nvidiot]

that was never ever the question at hand.
And if you had bothered reading anything, you would know that.

Yes it is, you started here,

http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=20378709&postcount=17

And then everyone else said it isnt, or have you not even been keeping up with your own argument? or is it you thats possibly been trolling in this thread>?

 

[Glaucus]

Part of our natural territory, does not equate to being adapted the same.

The differentiation between habitat and territory might of given it away, or the surving in water for brief periods to hunt, would be another.

So no it wasn't the question.

 

[Nvidiot]

So no it wasn't the question.

Boy is your reasoning skewed, that is what started it and is the question that everyone has been trying to answer and tell you, I think you are so lost in your claims you have lost sight of the goal, but I guess you can lead a horse to water and all that jazz.

 

[Glaucus]

Boy is your reasoning skewed, that is what started it and is the question that everyone has been trying to tell you, but i guess you can lead a horse to water and all that jazz.

No that isn't how it started. There is a huge difference between a territory and being equally adapted. I never once claimed we were equally adapted to survive on water as we are land. In fasted I agreed, we could only survive in water a brief time. That however does not count it out as a natural hunting ground as such part of out terittory.

So how is it skewed?

And when you mean everyone about 3 maybe 4 people.

 

[Nvidiot]

No that isn't how it started.

Yes it is, also started here,
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=20379807&postcount=78
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=20379842&postcount=81
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=20379870&postcount=83

Have you really lost sight of this that much you are now forgetting the basic reasoning of why we are not naturally at home in the water.

And when you mean everyone about 3 maybe 4 people.

within the first 3 pages, gets double that by page 6

 

[Glaucus]

Do you even read those quotes?

Natural place for us to be, in no way equates to equally adapted. Again, not once called it a habitat. And several times deffrentaited between habitat and terittory and again said brief periods of time for hunting.

 

[Nvidiot]

Do you even read those quotes?
.

Yes i did, and everyone else said your wrong.

You started then going on about certain hunting birds ( which i explained through evolution have adapted to the water) and then did a transient about icy conditions.

 

[Glaucus]

Yes i did, and everyone else said your wrong.

Don't care what anyone else said.

What I have said has never ever equated to equally adapted. It can't even be interpreted that way.

 

[Nvidiot]

Don't care what anyone else said.

And thats your folly.

 

[Glaucus]

And thats your folly.

Not at all, Im not discussing it with the others. I'm discussing it with you. And you had many many many posts to read to clarify my position. The fact your still coming out with this clap trap shows you're either arguing for the sake of it, or haven't actually read the posts,