I dont understand the reasoning either.
Shark Attack - your thoughts?
- Thread starter LiE
- Start date
I dont understand the reasoning either.
Yes. Water is a hunting ground for both. Crocodiles are better at it, or at least we're in the past.
Please we aren't adapted to land, because a bear has big claws and is a much better hunter than us.
Yet again we have adapted to be very generalised. We do not excell at anything physical. Does that stop us? No. It means we aren't as good as other animals at everything. Ignoring learning, communication and manipulation of materials.
evolved? like certain birds are water proof with oils, or have webbed feet to paddle, or have bills instead of beaks.
We haven't "evolved" as you put it.
Of course we have.
If we haven't evolved what have we done? Blinked into existence from no where.
Those are just far more specialised evolution traits. We only have one distinct trait that's are brain. Everything else has evolved in a general way, to enable us to achieve most things. From climbing cliffs to shallow diving.
Last edited:
Please explain how we have "evolved" to be adept on water.
Last edited:
You are talking about specialised adaption. That is not what a human is. We haven't evolved specialised adaptations, other than are brain. Our body has evolved to be able to cope with a huge range on environments and conditions.
So we can't swim, or hold are breath, even though that's a natural reflex when under water.
Of course we're adapted to land. Just because a bear with ravage you to death, doesn't mean humans aren't adapted for land lol
Of course we're adapted to land. Just because a bear with ravage you to death, doesn't mean humans aren't adapted for land lol
That's the basis of your argument not mine. If we apply it to both,
So your saying its not evolved like "certain hunting birds" as you put it, to be any good in water which isn't a natural enviroment with gills/webbed feet/streamlined shape.
Thank you.
We haven't evolved to be any good in any environment.
How good are we in hot environments?
How good are we in cold environments?
How good are we in wet environments?
Get the point, we aren't specialised.
We can swim perfectly fine, we have been hunting in the sea and rivers since we've existed in modern form. We are perfectly able to do those things with are bodies.
Of course we're adapted to land. Just because a bear with ravage you to death, doesn't mean humans aren't adapted for land lol
Cant even climb a tree to escape or gather food, as a bear is a bloody good climber
But we are good enough to be "naturally" on land yes.
Not in your terms of naturally. We need tools and learned behaviour. Which you wont agree is natural.
Also remember difference between territory and habitation, which again you aren't distinguishing between.
Last edited:
OK. I have concluded this...
AcidHell is some sort of human-crocodile hybrid who thinks it's natural for him to hunt in water with his bare hands.
If you want *** for tat. I've decided asim18 would be dead with his own ideas. Because tools are banned as is learned behaviour. There for he got wet, ate posionouse berries and died as a result of server dehydration, Hypotermia and a dead liver and kidneys.
Why can't you agree wee have hunted and gathered in the sea, since modern humans existed and we can do this perfectly well for limited territories. I am not saying we can live in the sea.
And none of those are any good, for the environments we live in. They only go so far. But yet. You call England, Netherlands and other places natural habitations. Even though we can't survive in them, with only are bodies natural adaptations. We need tools and other things?
Get the point?
So again which is it? Are places like Scotland natural habitations or not?
If you want to change your opinion to only very few places on earth are natural habitats that we don't need such tools to live, then I will say in your terms, water isn't a natural terittory to us.
But as long as you keep saying such places are natural, then water has to be a natural territory for us to hunt in as well.
Last edited:
You dont make any point.
We have as humans lived in these territory's well before the invention of tools and other things.
So what is it? land or sea as a natural environment?