![[Death]](/styles/overclockers/avatars/4.png){kind=avatar}
/ignore.
he has a point tho
Shark Attack - your thoughts?
- Thread starter LiE
- Start date
he has a point tho
Man has been on the earth before the invention of fire
That article only mentions one specialized species of bird so is irrelevant to this discussion.
Man has been on the earth before the invention of fire
Which means you are trying to say are only natural territory is certain parts of Africa?
And which man? I'm pretty sure modern man has always had fire. Which evolution step are you counting as human?
Nope, because you dont need fire to keep warm
The first man to rub two bits of stick together. who taught him to do this? thats right!! no one.
He didnt just become "human" as soon as he learned to make fire.
Am I that badly ill or does that heading make absolutely no sense.. "Ohio animal Terry Thompson owner shot himself - police" ;/
Nope, because you dont need fire to keep warm
You do in a lot of countries. You can not keep temprature significantly high enough, without fire.
I'm talking about human evolution, not which person rubbed two sticks together.
Even for people who share body warmth? works very well and is a good way to remain warm without fire
I'm talking about human evolution, god knows what your on about?
Even for people who share body warmth? works very well and is a good way to remain warm without fire
Yes even with body warmth. Try living an entire winter with just that in sub zero temperatures, once you've gone hunting/fishing/gathering and lost most of your heat as well as being wet.
You do understand that "Man" didn't just land in Antarctica/Scotland etc right?
They migrated from Africa or whatever bringing their fire making skills with them.
so what are you counting as human in your argument? Modern homo sapiens or one of the ancestors?
Depends what your talking about?
What defines your term of Modern vs Ancestor? please explain.
As soon as man made fire (without being taught by the way
) he became Modern simple tools arent enough, even monkeys use basic tools for thier gains but have yet to master the art of rubbing sticks together to make fire
Last edited:
That's exactly my point.
So if you are arguing that the sea is not natural territory because we have to learn to swim. Then pretty much none of the higher latitudes are natural territory as we need to learn fire making skills to survive. Which means in your argument, our only natural territory is small parts of Africa, where we original evolved. But thanks for agreeing and making my point.
Well humans have gone through several evolutionary points, as I'm sure you are well aware. Some of which had tools already. So the modern human never had a period with no tools.
Sea and land are two absolutely different eco systems. You cannot compare a human to a fish for goodness sake.
Not once have I compared a human to a fish. Lost the argument?
the sea is a hunting ground / resource, its not a natural human place to be, u cant wake up under water and swim down the shops, we are land mamals, thats natural to us, and forget all the creatures ure on about, we are talking about a shark, 1 thing that lives, breathes, kills , produces offsring in water!
Even primates us tools
Yep they do. Which is learnt. Again this is another of my points you have done a u-turn on and agree with me.