SimCity V (2013) - screens/artwork and information

So, with the beta over now, putting the DRM and £45/65 price (conveniently ignoring all the places selling it at £35), what did everyone think of it?

Its certainly enjoyable, and the whole process which encourages the city to grow and react seems a big step forward, the map is perhaps a little small still, but assuming thats the standard (or biggest) map you can have its not terrible IMO, especially as you can quickly switch between cities and pigeon-hole each one to have specific tasks rather than ploughing everything into 1 city.

One thing which did concern me was that i've been looking at SC with an attitude that the people i wanted to be on my community map would be expected to build attractive cities, or simply put, no filling the city with a series of grids just to maximise land and whatnot, but to make something more free-flowing and organic. However i went into the beta, got my 1hr's worth and the majority of it was grids. Even with curves and winding roads its still easier and more sensible to make grids. I still *plan* to make more realistic feeling cities, but instinctively you know grids are more efficient and easier/quicker to do, so you've kinda gotta fight against instinct and logic.

The other concern was just how easy it was. I've found SC4 to be a bit of a struggle in terms of getting the books balanced, and putting in all the services to keep them happy. Quite a lot of the early game its a bit of a struggle and then eventually your neutral or bringing in a small profit. In the SC5 beta theres almost no challenge, stick everything in and a ton of zoning down (now free zoning) and you can make a killing.

Maybe they'll put the charges back on RCI zoning, but im still not sure it'll make that much of a difference. I'd half expected it to be the same as SC4 and because your resource sharing (eg power & services) you can outsource and pay a small premium but not have the 40k outlay of a power plant and say 1k/hr cost that it needs to run at 500% of your needs. You'd just pay 250/hr to a neighbour, your paying less, they're getting subsidised, you both win. But you can stick multiple fire, police & hospital in the city and everything else, and theres no problems.
Maybe something was disabled which helped, i dunno, but it didnt seem to be a problem to take out all 3 loans and be saddled with the debt of doing that, build tons of stuff, and still be profitable.
 
Is there a mac version of this being made also or just windows?
There is, its not a lazy port though so its going to be a few months late from what i've inadvertently heard from interviews. No interest myself, so not certain beyond it being slightly behind the PC version.

I wish, Still play the old ones with all the packs
Same, for a long time there was a real flourish of sim games, with the Sim and Theme series leading the way. RCT3 and Transport Tycoon being 2 which are still great to this day imo, and i wish they'd reboot the series.
 
I wouldnt have thought so tbh. Has there been difficulty levels in the past? i cant recall that being the case, for the SC franchise or even The Sims (barely touched 1&2).
 
Really? Its been months since ive played it, and years before that.

Well, hopefully there is a difficulty setting, there needs to be a degree of challenge to it where you need some sort of strategy and careful planning to balance the books, rather than turning an easy profit without much effort needed.
Its certainly handy for the beta, so perhaps that was on easy difficulty so people could jump straight in, progress further and access a point in the game where they could build most items without worrying about funds.
 
SC4 has Easy - Medium - Hard

Wasnt the difficulty seeting just reflecting how much of a loan you could get initially. or starting cash etc.

It didnt have any bearing on how cities grew, pollution levels etc, it just determined how slow you had to start the game to build up cash.

Possibly it may have made disasters etc default rather than optional.
 
Never got around to the beta, but I'm encouraged by the reaction here. Was really expecting a backlash (if only because of EA_LOL) but it sounds like it might actually be fairly good!
 
Anyone seen the eu pack? Extra £20. Total cost £65 to play with eu roads ect.
Anyone else feel ea are just so damn greedy? Already selling extra dl content before the games published and for what should already be in the game. Theres a trailer on youtube showing previews of the pack.

Sc is known for the modding community. Will ea with the online play restrict modding and force people to use their dlc or will they allow all the mods that made previous sc's great and kept them alive.

£65 for a pc game is absolutely shocking. I hope the modding community release something that allows you to not use ea's servers and origin and host a seever on your own pc
 
This is EA all over it is happening with all SEGA titles as well, charging for DLC would be fine if the game was free but now they are charging for the game and then again for the complete version of the game, I will not be buying it at all, EA and SEGA are dead to me!
 
Its just plain greedy.. No wonder peoole turn to piracy with prices like that. Sc4 people just made them for free and ea charges £20 because were european
 
Never got around to the beta, but I'm encouraged by the reaction here. Was really expecting a backlash (if only because of EA_LOL) but it sounds like it might actually be fairly good!
The game is good. I am concerned that it's too easy, even with all the meta stuff with regards to coal power plants etc...

I'm not buying it because LOLEADRM, add to that their ****ing **** record of supporting online services...
 
Only just got round to replying to this about my thoughts on the beta but here goes.

I was very bored. I adore SC4 and have spent way too much time playing it, but this game felt very easy and too cartoon-y to be fun. It was like I was playing a kids game that required no effort. There is no denying that SC4 is graphically challenged by today's standards but its very functional and I am still surprised how good cities can look when they get to a grand scale. I also will miss how I could develop very large regions myself rather then having huge gaps between the cities. I think the city size on SC5 is insulting too and would be extremely restrictive.

All that said I did like the UI as I thought it had a fresh feel to it. It ran smoothly and at a good pace.

I very much doubt I will buy the game.
 
I would prefer SC4, if it didn;t constantly crash. I mean constantly, with no autosave, it pointless playing it.

I must be very lucky but I have had only a handful of crashes throughout my whole play time of the game. I have a constant save freak with games though so every few minutes I just save.
 
No way will it be getting bought no matter how good it is at £65 for what should have been included with it from the start.
 
I am surprised they haven't started making "Enhancement packs" where it is suited to your GPU or certain set up, I mean god forbid a game you buy actually works properly!!
 
Back
Top Bottom