Soldato
- Joined
- 30 Sep 2005
- Posts
- 16,726
Surely he's better than some of the other idiots we've had.
His policies are what were important. He changed working conditions, education, and human rights for the better. He introduced so much that people take for granted today. It was a rare time where a politician actually did what they said they would do for the people rather than his rich mates (not saying he still didnt earn a fair chunk btw). In many ways its a shame it got tainted with war, as he would no doubt be remembered as one of the best if it wasnt for that.
He was a decent PM and a million times better than the idiot we have now, and the ones in waiting.Can't say I disagree with you, but I was pretty young when he was PM so I can't remember much of that. It just seemed like everyone was comfortable.
I always find it interesting that people always bring up Iraq when talking about Tony Blair like it was the only thing that happened within his tenure. It’s almost as if it’s an ideological response to a labour PM.
What about that thing that caused nearly all the headaches with Brexit, oh yes, the good friday agreement, ending decades of ‘troubles’ and enabling a devolved government to form in Northern Ireland. Or the other interventions he green lit like Sierra Leone.
Compare that to how our interventions have gone since like Libya and Syria. It’s easy to forget about those.
His policies are what were important. He changed working conditions, education, and human rights for the better. He introduced so much that people take for granted today. It was a rare time where a politician actually did what they said they would do for the people rather than his rich mates (not saying he still didnt earn a fair chunk btw). In many ways its a shame it got tainted with war, as he would no doubt be remembered as one of the best if it wasnt for that.
However from 1997 to around 2003 it was indeed good days. Plenty of deregulation and money floating about. New Labour couldn't do anything wrong, they were walking on water so to speak. They were in abundance of self belief.
Labour had ideal circumstances to work with. And Blair took the reigns of a Labour party already 20 points ahead in the polls, with the Tories in absolute disarray. A real "what might have been" when it comes to his more left-leaning predecessor John Smith (who built that 20 point lead). Perhaps the Labour party wouldn't have become so fixated on the centre groundHe was lucky- right place, right time. Boom times and stability when he came in so those first years anyone would have benefitted. Even Ed Miliband would have looked a great PM with the set of circumstances Blair entered into
He's a smug arse who screwed Iraq and the middle East that eventually gave rise to Isis.
Yet he goes around preaching, total arse I'm my opinion.