You see you don't know you're born, basically you have fantastic coverage available to you.BT still looks better than Sky for football though.
Where's the HDR for F1, taking them long enough.
The sound is actually worst on UHD than normal HD.
You see you don't know you're born, basically you have fantastic coverage available to you.BT still looks better than Sky for football though.
Where's the HDR for F1, taking them long enough.
The sound is actually worst on UHD than normal HD.
Always turning the volume up a fair bit, right?
You see you don't know you're born, basically you have fantastic coverage available to you.
Well HD plays Dolby Digital 5.1 and UHD is Dolby Digital 5.1 plus for the UHD feed for sound for the F1 and a few other sports events, but it sounds much quieter.
That's not the issue though. I don't have to ramp up the volume to 20+ watching Blu-Ray on the PS3 with no voice enhancements or dynamic range compression. Unlike Sky when you can jump from channel to channel having to turn it up +10 or -10.
Sorry like but it’s not a patch on BT sports UHD football broadcastLots of complaints about sky, but tbh they put all other providers to shame, the football in hdr with atmos is just fantastic.
Loads of films and shows in uhd if you want , the f1 coverage is superb.
If you have a BT youview box the UHD football is streamed via the broadband rather than via satellite. That's why it looks better.Sorry like but it’s not a patch on BT sports UHD football broadcast
From what I have seen on sky glass the UHD quality is still not a patch on BT sport and that is streamed over broadband, so that’s now not much of an excuseIf you have a BT youview box the UHD football is streamed via the broadband rather than via satellite. That's why it looks better.
The source is the same so I doubt there's much of a difference.From what I have seen on sky glass the UHD quality is still not a patch on BT sport and that is streamed over broadband, so that’s now not much of an excuse
It doesn’t help when sky cripple the **** out of the bitrateThe source is the same so I doubt there's much of a difference.
I know this is the SkyQ thread but wanted to ask a quick question about Superfast Broadband (60mbps)
My service goes live in a few days and I already have the Sky router that's been sent out. There is also an engineer booked - What is he actually going to do? Just plug it in to the phone line?
Sky don't have engineers or anybody that visits for Broadband. That will be a visit from BT Openreach. Though, I was never aware of any engineers installing the router. That was always my side. But yeah, it'll be connected to the faceplate since you'll be on FTTC.
It's not FTTP is it?
Just saying the amount of money Sky charges and how long they've had UHD out for, HDR should be available to other sports other than just football and their bit rate should be better.
They’re limited by host broadcasters in many situations. The football they record and broadcast themselves. F1 provides UHD already. It would require the US Network, CBS I think does Masters coverage, to provide a UHD feed. I’m not sure they even do for their US viewers.Yeah, really wish they'd show golf in UHD, if not only the majors, Augusta would look fantastic.
They’re limited by host broadcasters in many situations. The football they record and broadcast themselves. F1 provides UHD already. It would require the US Network, CBS I think does Masters coverage, to provide a UHD feed. I’m not sure they even do for their US viewers.
They have done in previous years I believe.That's a shame, hopefully one day!
Maybe they could do The Open?