• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Skylake-X Lineup Leaked: i9-7980XE 18 Core Flagship Processor

Soldato
Joined
1 Jun 2010
Posts
7,053
Location
London
Intel Core i9-7980XE 18 Core Flagship Skylake-X Model

i9-7980XE%2018%20core%20cpu_zps8cpbgop4.jpg



i9-7980XE%2018%20core%20cpu2_zpsg7prqvhm.jpg


X299%20PCH_zpsrt6jfgvb.jpg


Intel%20Core-X%20series%20full%20lineup_zpsi86jgxnz.jpg


X299%20Series%20Platform_zps6kjasmjq.jpg


https://newsroom.intel.com/press-kits/intel-core-x-series-processors/


OLD NEWS: 12/05/17


Hi guys

Some very interesting info regarding the upcoming Skylake-X/Kabylake-X cpus has been leaked on the anandtech forums by a poster who appears to have inside knowledge of the X299 cpus. Intel will be using i9 labelling for the Skylake-X processors replacing the previous i7 extreme naming of the HEDT parts. All the Skylake-X cpus use X nomenclature at the end of their names.


Exclusive: Skylake-X (Core i9) Lineup and Specifications

Core i9-7920X
12C/24T
16.5MB L3
44 PCIe lanes
Clocks TBD (August Launch)

Core i9-7900X

10C/20T
13.75MB L3
44 PCIe Lanes
3.3Ghz Base
4.3Ghz Turbo 2.0
4.5Ghz Turbo 3.0!

Core i9-7820X

8C/16T
11MB L3
28 PCIe Lanes
3.6Ghz Base
4.3Ghz Turbo 2.0
4.5Ghz Turbo 3.0

Core i9-7800X

6C/12T
8.25MB L3
28 PCIe Lanes
3.5Ghz Base
4.0Ghz Turbo 2.0

Core i7-7740K
4C/8T
8MB L3
16 PCIe Lanes
4.3Ghz Base
4.5Ghz Turbo 2.0

Core i7-7640K
4C/4T
6MB L3
16 PCIe Lanes
4.0Ghz Base
4.2Ghz Turbo 2.0

- L2 cache = 1MB (Skylake-X), 4x as much as Core i7-7700K
- Dual DDR4-2666 for Kaby Lake-X / Quad DDR4-2666 for Skylake-X
- 112W for Kaby Lake-X / up to 160W for Skylake-X
- Apparently all Core i9 parts support AVX-512 (TBC)
- Launch in June, except 7920X (August)

Will share the image you guys want as soon as I'm allowed to. :)

Interesting that i5 which was rumoured to be on X299 is actually and i7-7640k with 4 threads. The 6 & 8 core parts have only 28 PCI-E lanes whilst the full 44 PCI-E lanes have been relegated to 10 core and 12 core parts. The base clock speeds look pretty good :cool:.

Just need to know the pricing now.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
28 Jan 2010
Posts
1,547
Location
Brighton
I find it hard to believe even the 8-core has 28 PCI lanes.

If they're not careful with pricing, AMDs X399 range is going to make this look stupid. Apart from in single-core I suppose, but you wouldn't buy this platform for single-core performance.
 
Don
Joined
19 May 2012
Posts
17,196
Location
Spalding, Lincolnshire
Calling shenanigans purely based on L3 cache sizes - no other chips have anything other than whole MB's of cache, and can't see how it would work (even if they were harvested from Xeons with more cores e.g. 24 core or 20 core chips) :

Core i9-7920X - 12C/24T - 16.5MB L3
Core i9-7900X - 10C/20T - 13.75MB L3
Core i9-7820X - 8C/16T - 11MB L3
Core i9-7800X - 6C/12T - 8.25MB L3
Core i7-7740K - 4C/8T - 8MB L3
Core i7-7640K - 4C/4T - 6MB L3
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Jan 2015
Posts
4,904
Location
West Midlands
Calling shenanigans purely based on L3 cache sizes - no other chips have anything other than whole MB's of cache, and can't see how it would work (even if they were harvested from Xeons with more cores e.g. 24 core or 20 core chips) :


Core i9-7920X - 12C/24T - 16.5MB L3
Core i9-7900X - 10C/20T - 13.75MB L3
Core i9-7820X - 8C/16T - 11MB L3
Core i9-7800X - 6C/12T - 8.25MB L3
Core i7-7740K - 4C/8T - 8MB L3
Core i7-7640K - 4C/4T - 6MB L3

Good shout
 

RSR

RSR

Soldato
Joined
17 Aug 2006
Posts
9,547
Calling shenanigans purely based on L3 cache sizes - no other chips have anything other than whole MB's of cache, and can't see how it would work (even if they were harvested from Xeons with more cores e.g. 24 core or 20 core chips) :

Core i9-7920X - 12C/24T - 16.5MB L3
Core i9-7900X - 10C/20T - 13.75MB L3
Core i9-7820X - 8C/16T - 11MB L3
Core i9-7800X - 6C/12T - 8.25MB L3
Core i7-7740K - 4C/8T - 8MB L3
Core i7-7640K - 4C/4T - 6MB L3

What's the betting that the top end model is priced at £1999.99?
 
Soldato
Joined
12 May 2014
Posts
5,237
What's the betting that the top end model is priced at £1999.99?
I don't think intel can simply price them as they wish with AMD being so competitive. Considering the target audience for these CPUs going on the rumored core count, I think AMD might come out of this fight the winners. We will have to wait and see.
 
Soldato
Joined
13 Jun 2009
Posts
6,847
They need to spread it downwards to match AMD's Ryzen range and it lowers the price barrier to the enthusiast platform.
Why? Intel's HEDT platform can't compete with AMD's mainstream platform unless they drop prices significantly, unless you think there's lots of people out there who favour quad channel memory and other "nice to haves" over pure CPU grunt. Plus it still has to compete with AMD's HEDT platform. Blurring the lines so much is kinda weird - as low as 4c/4t on HEDT and as high as 6c/12t on mainstream is pretty odd. Surely it means fewer enthusiasts will actually bother with Intel's HEDT, no? I still can't see any use case for an i7-7640K or and i7-7740K (based on that list). I don't believe this list though, why would a desktop i7 suddenly not have HyperThreading?

A 10c/20t chip with 4.5 GHz boost would be amazing but I don't really get all of these boost figures now. If the base is 3.3 GHz and it needs "turbo 3.0", whatever that is, to get to 4.5 GHz, that suggests to me it can only sustain that on (a) a low number of cores, and (b) a very short period of time.
 
Associate
Joined
27 Aug 2008
Posts
1,874
Location
London
Why? Intel's HEDT platform can't compete with AMD's mainstream platform unless they drop prices significantly, unless you think there's lots of people out there who favour quad channel memory and other "nice to haves" over pure CPU grunt. Plus it still has to compete with AMD's HEDT platform. Blurring the lines so much is kinda weird - as low as 4c/4t on HEDT and as high as 6c/12t on mainstream is pretty odd. Surely it means fewer enthusiasts will actually bother with Intel's HEDT, no? I still can't see any use case for an i7-7640K or and i7-7740K (based on that list). I don't believe this list though, why would a desktop i7 suddenly not have HyperThreading?

A 10c/20t chip with 4.5 GHz boost would be amazing but I don't really get all of these boost figures now. If the base is 3.3 GHz and it needs "turbo 3.0", whatever that is, to get to 4.5 GHz, that suggests to me it can only sustain that on (a) a low number of cores, and (b) a very short period of time.

Equally, why not. Highend Z270 and X99 prices overlap in the £200-350 range. You will probably be looking at a ~£350 entry price onto the HEDT platform for board+cpu with plentiful upgrade options, which will appeal. Mainstream is maxed out at 4c8t (or soon - mid 2018? - at 6c/12t). There are plenty of mainstream buyers for which 4 cores is a minimum spec. i3's don't factor into their purchase considerations. Gives them an attractive Intel alternative to AMD along with the esteem of the HEDT line and the clockspeed of Kabylake.

I wouldn't expect 4 cores to remain on the HEDT platform on the next round of releases after 6 cores have hit mainstream.
 

RSR

RSR

Soldato
Joined
17 Aug 2006
Posts
9,547
I don't think intel can simply price them as they wish with AMD being so competitive. Considering the target audience for these CPUs going on the rumored core count, I think AMD might come out of this fight the winners. We will have to wait and see.

I don't think they will in all honesty, as we haven't seen a price drop on the current CPU's lines from Intel. It's why i'd surmise these line of CPU's will be no different, it would be interesting if they do though.
 
Soldato
Joined
12 May 2014
Posts
5,237
I don't think they will in all honesty, as we haven't seen a price drop on the current CPU's lines from Intel. It's why i'd surmise these line of CPU's will be no different, it would be interesting if they do though.
TBF the mainstream sector its neck and neck in performance, so cutting prices isn't necessary. For the high end AMD does have better multi-core performance compared to intel.
 

RSR

RSR

Soldato
Joined
17 Aug 2006
Posts
9,547
TBF the mainstream sector its neck and neck in performance, so cutting prices isn't necessary. For the high end AMD does have better multi-core performance compared to intel.

True, it should make for a very interesting H2 2017.

I'm looking forward to the 720P benchmarks. :p
 
Back
Top Bottom