Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 May 2004
- Posts
- 4,488
- Location
- Tall building nearby
What about a boxer?
That is a mutually agreed situation of combat through sport, neither has the right, they allow each other to use force in a contest.
What about a boxer?
Well you're hitting them in both cases, but the difference is the amount of force used.
And there is no age when your parents cannot give you a good slap in my view. If my dad hit me now, I'd be surprised but that is his right as a father and I'd not get him done for assault. My father loves me and I trust that he'd not do so unless I did something extreme and needed the sense knocked into me.
Self-defence ?
Instead of doing what feels right - how about doing what's best for the child & the society they will grow up in.Threads like this seem a bit stupid neither for or against is going to convince the other. The simple answer when it comes to parenting is "Do what feels right" some kids respond better to a smack than just being talked at, and for some kids, well some kids for just messed up beyond repair
Instead of doing what feels right - how about doing what's best for the child & the society they will grow up in.
Instincts are not always reliable, you should do what is most likely based off reason & observed trends to result in your child having a good overall upbringing.Who is to say they are not the same thing?
Strong argument for maternal/ paternal instincts that have been developed over millions of years vs strangers telling you, in their opinion, what you should be doing.
Instead of doing what feels right - how about doing what's best for the child & the society they will grow up in.
Why is that so hard to believe?
Hitting your child in any manner be it light or hard is physical abuse. If i walked up to you in the street and slapped your partners arse, she could get me done for abuse.
But it didn't leave a mark, it didn't hurt, so what's the problem?
But i was heavily abused as a child and i hope to god that i have the strength to never pass that burden onto my kids.
Not really, the studies do indeed show that severe abuse is much much worse, but it also shows it's negative impacts seem to be linear, increasing in severity with frequency.Ah so there we have it. The reason for your stance is based on your past experiences. Funnily enough a lot of people who were occasionally smacked as a child don't see the problem with doing the same to their kids as there's a world of difference between the two things which you can't see because of your experiences.
Instincts are not always reliable, you should do what is most likely based off reason & observed trends to result in your child having a good overall upbringing.
You make it sound like one persons subjective opinion is in any way equal or even greater than a body of research. People who actually genuinely beat their children hard use that line of reasoning - I'd wager most child abusers simply follow instinct with no greater consideration to the facts at hand.
The reason he likely feels strongly about it is because of his experience who has led him to investigate further & read up on the subject more than the average person.

Not really, the studies do indeed show that severe abuse is much much worse, but it also shows it's negative impacts seem to be linear, increasing in severity with frequency.
The reason he likely feels strongly about it is because of his experience who has led him to investigate further & read up on the subject more than the average person.
The problem is that my partner is a) an adult
Do you have kids? I don't. I just want to see what point of view you are coming from.
You use that word abuse. To me, smacking your child as a last resort to discipline them is not abuse. A child crying after they are smacked is most likely down to shock, not actual pain. It's a defence mechanism.
I would agree with the studies if by the word abuse, they mean actual beatings, sexual, constant belittling, etc.
LOL, this is funny.
99% of parent's do not want to smack their kids, and when they do, its a light slap. It shocks them, not hurts them.
Is that another form of human that a child is not privy too?
Your removing the humanity from the child by labelling it as a child and as such justifying inappropriate actions.
That's the point, with regards to this matter there is research to back up both sides of the argument.