Sleeping Dogs Bench Thread

MeatLoaf · 22 Aug 2013 at 10:52

2500K @ 4.0Ghz, GTX670 @ 1134/1553

1080p

1440p

Kaapstad · 22 Aug 2013 at 11:54

LtMatt said:
I'd be surprised if cpu made that much difference in this gpu limited bench. 10 fps for 90mhz extra on the memory seems a bit extreme. Maybe you're using old drivers Nocky?

My CPU clock is a bit faster, I am using PCI-E 3.0 x16 and a slightly higher memory clock.

I also noticed with some of the runs I did last night that going much above 1160mhz on the core did not give much more in fps and in a couple of runs actually resulted in a lower score. When I ran a single core I got 55.1 @1160mhz and 55.2 @1180mhz lol.

Nocky24 · 22 Aug 2013 at 12:03

LtMatt said:
I'd be surprised if cpu made that much difference in this gpu limited bench. 10 fps for 90mhz extra on the memory seems a bit extreme. Maybe you're using old drivers Nocky?

My gpus were running a bit hot though, which might have been lowering my boost clocks a tad. Can't re-run it though now as I'm at work and the second card is going back for a refund today

Kaapstad · 22 Aug 2013 at 12:20

Scores updated.

TheRealDeal · 22 Aug 2013 at 12:40

Whats going on with Meatloaf's gtx670 as there's a 35% difference between that and the nearest gtx680. Surely thats not all down to the lower memory clocks.

whyscotty · 22 Aug 2013 at 12:51

[email protected]

Titan @ 981/1802

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

LtMatt · 22 Aug 2013 at 14:30

Nice temp on that titan scotty.

Jerry64 · 22 Aug 2013 at 15:12

MSI GTX680 POWER EDITION
1254/1928
i5 2500k @ 4.4GHz

78DDDF10BC0FBAA78365BB052DBC428D244474A5

layte · 22 Aug 2013 at 15:34

My Titan's are way too CPU limited at such low resolution. Roll on IB-E, the 920 has had an amazing run.

MeatLoaf · 22 Aug 2013 at 15:37

TheRealDeal said:
Whats going on with Meatloaf's gtx670 as there's a 35% difference between that and the nearest gtx680. Surely thats not all down to the lower memory clocks.

Possibly, I think they running a 6 core cpu at 4.9Ghz as well, 900Mhz faster than my 2500K

Kaapstad · 22 Aug 2013 at 15:52

Scores updated.

Uncle Petey · 22 Aug 2013 at 16:01

Kaapstad said:
Have you tried using Win7, Snipping Tool to get the score at the end.

Confused Stu said:
I used Steam's built in screenshot to get mine - the key's F12 and I'm pretty sure I've never changed it so that should be the default.

lol, yeah. I totally forgot about those

Too busy trying to figure out why I was getting crashes with previously stable OC's amongst other things...

Btw, it turned out that fraps only lost me 0.4-1fps anyway

Angst · 22 Aug 2013 at 16:09

2500k @ 4.5ghz
2 x 7850 @ 950/1250

catalyst 13.6

Kaapstad · 22 Aug 2013 at 16:23

Angst said:
2500k @ 4.5ghz
2 x 7850 @ 950/1250

catalyst 13.6

Don't forget to turn off the FPS Limiter, you never know you may gain a bit.

Score updated.

Angst · 22 Aug 2013 at 16:31

I would turn it off if my max fps was anywhere near 120 haha.
Anyway

2500k @ 4.5ghz
2 x 7850 @ 950/1250

catalyst 13.8 beta 2 frame pacing on

LtMatt · 22 Aug 2013 at 16:54

MeatLoaf said:
Possibly, I think they running a 6 core cpu at 4.9Ghz as well, 900Mhz faster than my 2500K

No chance, sleeping dogs is about as demanding on a decent quad core cpu as tetris.

vfdb · 22 Aug 2013 at 17:08

HD 7850 @ 1250/1500

i5 3570k @ 4.7

Driver: 13.8 beta 2

whyscotty · 22 Aug 2013 at 18:20

From one of our friends on holiday - Rusty

780 @ 1215/1801 and i7 3770k @ 4.6 GHz

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

wazza300 · 22 Aug 2013 at 18:23

trust it to be a game I don't have

LtMatt · 22 Aug 2013 at 18:38

wazza300 said:
trust it to be a game I don't have

You can find it really cheap now.