Sleeping Dogs Bench Thread

[wazza300]

my sis has it,ill do a sneaky bench but it will be with an i3 cpu/7850

 

[Kaapstad]

CPU i7 [email protected]
HD5970@725/1200 13.8 drivers

Spoiler

CPU i7 [email protected]
2 x HD5970@725/1200 13.8 drivers

Spoiler

They are only 1gb cards so I was quite pleased when they ran the bench.

Good scaling too going from xfire to quadfire.

Will overclock them when I get more time (my mum uses the telly they are attached to).

Scores updated.

 

[whyscotty]

i5 [email protected]

770@1376/8204


Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

[oweneades]

Quick bench on my laptop:

GTX 780M @ 849/5000 (Stock)
i7 4700MQ @ 3.2Ghz (assumed boosting to quad core speed)

Will try a bit of clocking now.

EDIT:

GTX780M @ 888/5400 (+50/+200)
i7 4700MQ @ 3.2Ghz (assumed boosting to quad core speed)

I will need to get the laptop on my custom cooler to push it any further. Temps are pretty high for these 780m's thanks to the terrible cooler fitted.

Very good scaling considering the clock speed bump. ~8% performance boost for a ~4.6% bump on the core & 8% on the memory.

EDIT 2: What are people setting the world density to? I have mine set to Extreme which I assume is correct.

 

[Shiari]

Can't manage full screen, it's windowed ... not sure it really matters though.

770 @ 1254/3505, 4770K 4.6

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

 

[Confused Stu]

Ok, determined to close the gap between my last score and LtMatt and his storming 7950's, so had a play around with drivers, settings and overclocks:

All done with 2 x 7970:

13.8 Beta 2, Frame Pacing On - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.6
Av: 97.2 - Max: 138.3 - Min: 67.2

13.8 Beta 2, Frame Pacing Off - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.6
Av: 100.2 - Max: 156.0 - Min: 58.0

13.6 Beta 2 - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.6
Av: 99.6 - Max: 132.7 - Min: 67.5

13.6 Beta 2 - 1100/1500 - 2600k @ 4.6
Crash both times I tried it

13.6 Beta 2 - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.8
Av: 100.6 - Max: 150.2 - Min: 62.7

13.6 Beta 2 - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.8 - Game moved to SSD
Av: 100.2 - Max; 153.5 - Min: 59.2

Making this my best score:

LtMatt - I admit defeat! Can't get even close to your score mate, well done mate.

 

[Uncle Petey]

Stu, what clocks can your cards achieve individually? I assume they're voltage locked.

 

[RavenXXX2]

3570k @ 4.7

GTX 680 @ 1290/1705

Spoiler

 

[whyscotty]

3570k @ 4.7

GTX 680 @ 1290/1705

Spoiler

Nice score

Is that with the MSI you have in the MM?

 

[LtMatt]

Ok, determined to close the gap between my last score and LtMatt and his storming 7950's, so had a play around with drivers, settings and overclocks:

All done with 2 x 7970:

13.8 Beta 2, Frame Pacing On - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.6
Av: 97.2 - Max: 138.3 - Min: 67.2

13.8 Beta 2, Frame Pacing Off - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.6
Av: 100.2 - Max: 156.0 - Min: 58.0

13.6 Beta 2 - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.6
Av: 99.6 - Max: 132.7 - Min: 67.5

13.6 Beta 2 - 1100/1500 - 2600k @ 4.6
Crash both times I tried it

13.6 Beta 2 - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.8
Av: 100.6 - Max: 150.2 - Min: 62.7

13.6 Beta 2 - 1050/1500 - 2600k @ 4.8 - Game moved to SSD
Av: 100.2 - Max; 153.5 - Min: 59.2

Making this my best score:

LtMatt - I admit defeat! Can't get even close to your score mate, well done mate.

100fps looks about right Stu. Remember my cards were overclocked and yours are at stock. If you pushed them a little bit more you'd overtake me easily.

 

[Confused Stu]

100fps looks about right Stu. Remember my cards were overclocked and yours are at stock. If you pushed them a little bit more you'd overtake me easily.

My launch reference card (that's now fitted with the accelero) ran 1175/1575 quite happily without fiddling with voltages. Since adding the Windforce one, I crash if I go higher than 1050/1500 on both. I've never tried the Windforce solo to see what it can do. To be honest, I don't ever miss the extra 10% I might get by pushing the cards harder (most games that aren't playable on 3 screens wouldn't be without 50% extra), so I'm quite happy with leaving the cards at 1050/1500 and not pushing the temps any higher than they currently are. I'm quite happy with others benching higher than me mate, I'm a gamer and a tinkerer, not a bench junkie.

 

[Kaapstad]

EDIT 2: What are people setting the world density to? I have mine set to Extreme which I assume is correct.

I have been using Extreme.

All scores updated.

 

[RavenXXX2]

Nice score

Is that with the MSI you have in the MM?

Certainly is.

Managed to squeeze a few more Mhz out of her

1305/1759

3570k 4.7

326.80 drivers

Spoiler

 

[Shiari]

No rush to update, but I was using 320.49 drivers. Thanks Kaapstad.

 

[Kaapstad]

No rush to update, but I was using 320.49 drivers. Thanks Kaapstad.

Thanks.

Scoreboard updated.

 

[Kei]

Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.75
Radeon HD6950 970/1500
13.8 Beta 2

 

[Kaapstad]

Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.75
Radeon HD6950 970/1500
13.8 Beta 2

Scoreboard updated.

 

[oweneades]

I have been using Extreme.

All scores updated.

Excellent.

I will run some more over the weekend to see how far the 780M can go - limited to +135Mhz on the core due to the bios at the moment.

Assuming similar scaling to the above, I should end up around 45-47FPS @ +135/+500 (980/6000). Could someone run the benchmark on a stock GTX670 to see the performance delta please?

Luckily I received the replacement GPU heatsink screws yesterday. Should be able to do another repaste now on the 780M. The crews just happen to be tiny and made of cheese.

Now I just need to get a replacement rear cover so I don't have to run with it off to keep GPU temps down (Seriously Clevo designed this thing without any ventilation holes directly above the GPU itself, relying on the heatpipes alone to transfer over 100w of heat to a tiny fin array.... )

 

[Kaapstad]

Single HD 7970 @1280/1850
3970x @4.8
13.6 beta 2 drivers

Spoiler

2 x HD7970 @1260/1800
3970x @4.8
13.6 beta 2 drivers

Spoiler

 

[LtMatt]

Tut tut Kapellini, you should be using the new frame pacing drivers. Though i could understand you disabling it for the bench.