• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Sleeping Dogs Bench Thread

Just ran this benchmark @ 4k, 7990 and i7 4770K @ stock - 9.6FPS :D :D

Need some serious overclocking done, system almost came to a stop half way through :p
 
One for LtMatt and Humbug

4K score
4 x 290X @1220/1625
4930k @4.8

pVWLCQT.jpg



Ahx6jGZ.jpg
 
Only 28% faster than your Titans? Son i am dissapoint. :p

Nice score Kaap. How's the vram usage on Sleeping Dogs at 4k?
 
1080p Score
3 x 290X @1220/1625
4930k @4.8

5qhQxK9.jpg


KwoUC73.jpg

A little bit more driver optimisation and we will be there.:D
 
arc@css said:
Good min fps, Matt - especially when you consider the res / game. :)
Click to expand...

AMD seem to have worse min fps on this bench, noticed Kaaps are similar. Will have another bash at this tomorrow when it's cooler might be able to improve the average a few fps.
 
LtMatt said:
AMD seem to have worse min fps on this bench, noticed Kaaps are similar. Will have another bash at this tomorrow when it's cooler might be able to improve the average a few fps.
Click to expand...

The AMD drivers are rubbish @1080p fortunately this changes as the resolution goes up and the cards are no longer CPU bottlenecked. NVidia drivers give you up to 20fps more @1080p not that getting over 200fps is any use for gaming.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom