I listened to some of today’s evidence but I'm still unclear how in-step or whether any type of collusion took place between POL and FJ.
Outside of the Gareth Jenkins debacle and how, why or who instructed him to act as a witness, expert or otherwise. it appears FJ acted like most corporate entities within a commercial supplier to a customer context. Evidence seems to suggest FJ documented various issues, including the ability for remote access to branch terminals, which was seemingly shared at various points to POL executives.
As a former IT consultant, I do have an inkling of sympathy for Gareth Jenkins, who thus far has been described as highly technical and seemingly an open and transparent individual with whomever he interacted with. I've worked within an environment where highly technical individuals have been approached by commercial or legal teams to provide statements around a tailored technical question and goodness knows where those ended up.
Whether instruction was given to him or not, his evidence next week will be interesting.