Social Media getting a bit...overbearing.

Then teach it in schools, call it the ***** and ***** section of a history lesson. You could even make it so they have to find the worst people from history, excluding the obvious examples and talk about why they're ***** and *****.

Too many teachers don't know much about history. I remember when in school during the early to mid 90s, we never got history about our country. It was always something like Germany, Luftwaffe.
 

lol, found this beauty in the comments too

bayCiY0.png
 
I dont know much about why he was let go but if it was specifically for those comments, then considering they are right there on the blm go fund me page, in what way is it justified?

A GoFundMe page can be started by anybody. I would make the reasonable assumption that one that starts with "Yo Family" is not official in any capacity so I'm not sure what you're getting your knickers in a bunch about.
 
Considering it has raised £844k in all likelihood it is legitimate. If it contained positions they do not hold it would likely be swiftly corrected too.

Okay so lets look at their position on their website.

https://blacklivesmatter.com/news/

So defund the police to take one point. (See link above) This is obviously anti police so in what way was Farage incorrect on this?
 
Considering it has raised £844k in all likelihood it is legitimate. If it contained positions they do not hold it would likely be swiftly corrected too.

Okay so lets look at their position on their website.

https://blacklivesmatter.com/news/

So defund the police to take one point. (See link above) This is obviously anti police so in what way was Farage incorrect on this?

Is this website anything to do with the people claiming to be BLM UK? People seem to be conflating the two. They don't seem to be related.

Stations like LBC are heavily dependant on advertising revenue and having a presenter that is critical of the protests or the movement is going to get removed to protect commercial interests.
 
I dont see why they wouldn't be related. There must be many parallels and wouldnt expect most to be aware of any differences.

Well if radio hosts responsible for guiding the nations conversations are subject to commercial interests we will be left with a narrow range of subjects to discuss. Meh LBC is crap anyway.
 
I dont see why they wouldn't be related. There must be many parallels and wouldnt expect most to be aware of any differences..

I could make my own BLM London page and no one would be none the wiser. You're trying to link two different groups because the name is similar.

Well if radio hosts responsible for guiding the nations conversations are subject to commercial interests we will be left with a narrow range of subjects to discuss. Meh LBC is crap anyway.

So is Farage.
 
Wasn't there a recurring skit where the irritating one did blackface?

It was basically the " hell my black friend" right?

Oh no I know which one now, It was the coffee lady at the airport.

That was bloody funny though, as was Tarj Mansoor or what ever his name was.
Little Britain took the **** out of stereotypes and made a point to take the **** out of racism too.

I don't agree any of these shows should be taken down.
 
Whats the problem? Their site, their rules.

Not dissimilar to here. You can't insult people or talk about competitiors etc.

Nothing is stopping you making your own app and calling your friend a **** on that.

Other people's websites don't owe you anything, and can decide what is and isn't posted on them (within the law obviously).
 
I'm seeing more and more backlash against BLM from black communities tired of them exploiting their experiences of past racism and labelling them as oppressed victims. BLM must think black people are stupid if they don't think their hypocrisy and motives aren't transparent, they don't care about black lives unless there is a white person involved, they do nothing for the black community other than destroy it with riots and create divisions. Now their poisonous racism has spread to the UK our weak police response to the terrorists has resulted in what can only be described as a race war with BLM and white nationalists, two sides of the same coin.
 
So you're denying the masses of black people speaking out against BLM just because you haven't seen action yet, that's pretty bigoted.

I'm questioning the role of selection bias in the place of a meaningful trend, especially if it is based on what one has witnessed on social media, that's all. If there's a real shift in said communities, then it'll show itself the only way it can, which is at the ballot box. It seems like a meaningful and reasonable metric to me, I am unaware of any continuous polling on the matter.

Honestly, it is just a matter of reticence, I don't mean ill by it.
 
Well it was reflected at the ballot boxes, Trump got elected, many black people identify as conservative and consider the concept of systemic racism to be a myth perpetuated by extreme left groups like BLM.

The term institutional racism is more damaging to the black psyche than almost any other word I can think of. It encourages black America to think of society of as actively and reprehensibly racist and perpetuates bitterness to something they can't see or feel. What institutions? All government institution? Law enforcement, the military, schools, private corporations? All of these are viewed as irredeemably racist by this ideology.



 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom