My point precisely wouldn't`t put it better myself.Hang on...so the 'child' is earning a wage, burning Electric,gas,using water,eating your food and causing general wear and tear and some think they shouldn't contribute...
Does my head in
I agree with you.
The idea of 'teaching them a lesson' about money is ridiculous. If a child gets to 16 or whatever age they have a job and they don't understand how money works then you have bigger problems and/or you've been a soft touch on them when they were younger. I'd want to help them save up as much money as possible so that they can put down a deposit for a house. The only exception would be if the parents actually needed the money which is fair enough.
Personal circumstances dictate this. It isn't the 1940's anymore when everyone paid into a pot to run the household.
If my child was a scrote who did nothing around the house I'd be charging to make a point.
However, I'm not raising my child that way, so his contributions will be helping to cook/clean/muck in with the family.
Financial 'real world' training will be showing them how to save and budget.
All that said, he's 9 months old.... I've got a while yet.
who will never benefit from this.
Completely agree here.
I would only charge my kids if I knew they weren't actively saving a good portion of their salary. Which lets face it, half of those who have replied on here have said they've put it in a savings account to help for a deposit when they leave, how is that any different to them putting that money into a savings account in the first place.
Just out of interest, do you put any money away now for your child when he is older?
Yes I do, started as soon as he was born. He won't stand a chane of university otherwise. Why do you ask ?
We put 1000 in as a start, and I think 50 PCM. It might just about fund year 1.