Associate
- Joined
- 17 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 1,895
- Location
- Dublin
oh man this thread is very, very silly.
its quite simple- the op got id'd as the store have a policy not to sell solvents to under 21's, as is their right as a retailer.
the op had id that proved he was legally old enough to buy solvents (older than 16), but not old enough to buy solvents under the store's 'no solvents for under 21s' policy.
this is perfectly normal. as has been stated a few times (sometimes using silly examples), a retailer can set any policy they choose as regards who they sell to. You have no 'right to buy'. The retailer has the right to choose who to do business with.
It is perfectly legal for them to refuse to serve anyone, for any reason whatsoever, providing that reason does not break the law. In fact, it isn't just perfectly legal- it is the retailers right.
The law states the minimum age at which you can purchase something. It does not mean the store has to sell it to you because you exceed the minimum age.
I can't really see how people are getting confused
TG
its quite simple- the op got id'd as the store have a policy not to sell solvents to under 21's, as is their right as a retailer.
the op had id that proved he was legally old enough to buy solvents (older than 16), but not old enough to buy solvents under the store's 'no solvents for under 21s' policy.
this is perfectly normal. as has been stated a few times (sometimes using silly examples), a retailer can set any policy they choose as regards who they sell to. You have no 'right to buy'. The retailer has the right to choose who to do business with.
It is perfectly legal for them to refuse to serve anyone, for any reason whatsoever, providing that reason does not break the law. In fact, it isn't just perfectly legal- it is the retailers right.
The law states the minimum age at which you can purchase something. It does not mean the store has to sell it to you because you exceed the minimum age.
I can't really see how people are getting confused
TG
Last edited:

