Caporegime
24fps is what you want, it's what our eyes are comfortable with for a film.
You are right of course but for me it's about the target audience, most of our target audience don't care about 4k 60fps or such things.
If I'm honest I still don't know single person that watches anything in 4k consistently and certainly not over the interwebs due to the bandwidth requirements.
24fps is what you want, it's what our eyes are comfortable with for a film.
Andy, guessing you've done some searching on the subject? Lots of Youtube videos with various solutions and settings. Looks like there's no 'one size fits all' setting though.
4K will come around. I know it's not a fair comparison now, but can you imagine watching someone with 460p content? In a few years I think 4K will be more common and I guess it will eventually get to the place that 1080p is now. I still have converted family VHS video from many years back which looks terrible these days. Would I rather have it in 1080p? Of course.
60fps, I guess I'm so used to the gaming culture of higher is better. I do often grab stills off video, which will/can be better at a higher fps, right? I also sometimes go sporting events where I would think a higher fps would be better. I tend to prefer to have these options than to not, I guess.
What if my eyes are used to 90fps from playing games (I do that a lot more than I watch films)
I work in video production and we still output at 1080 25/30 and that's typically web based video ads for multinational companies. I find it funny that the consumer/prosumer market are pushing 4k at high frame rates more than we are. Outputting at higher resolutions, frame rates and thus bit rates kills our workflow massively, and adds a huge amount of time ingesting, transcoding and rendering, amending, rendering again...
That said we often shoot at 4k so that we can reframe in post, and sometime at higher frame rates if we want to time remap/slow down footage for a specific look.
When it is work, it is all about time and money and need.
When it is a consumer...it's about want, rather than need.
I work in video production and we still output at 1080 25/30 and that's typically web based video ads for multinational companies. I find it funny that the consumer/prosumer market are pushing 4k at high frame rates more than we are. Outputting at higher resolutions, frame rates and thus bit rates kills our workflow massively, and adds a huge amount of time ingesting, transcoding and rendering, amending, rendering again...
That said we often shoot at 4k so that we can reframe in post, and sometime at higher frame rates if we want to time remap/slow down footage for a specific look.
It will come around yes you are right but the infrastructure is just not there to support it reasonably even if the demand was there but it isn't and both are years away still in my view. Also phone and tablet screens are far and away the biggest consumption method of internet based media and they aren't 4k anyway.
Also are these videos for you personally or your youtube channel as I would have thought that could make a difference and also what would the primary content be.