The OP needs to fill in the paper work, get the advice of a solicitor and mount a defence based on the fact that the vehicle is not capable of that speed and push for the charge to be dropped and all costs reimbursed.
Yes but come on, it's got to be a mistake surely?
I doubt his DAD would be doing this at 8am in the morning in a Transit of all things. If 8am there is anything is like its there, then shave off 100mph and you got the average speed of commute. I've driven a lot of vans in my time of all types and 115mph while doable in a Transit would take a whole lot of time, plus if its his commute he'd know the road well enough to know that going past a camera at that speed would not be productive to his future driving career. Speed cameras malfunction, they're not the totally infallible things the ones in power make them to be, speed guns can be wildly inaccurate too with the operator just moving slightly when aiming (i have a mate in traffic who tells me a lot of the police themselves are not exactly wild about cameras either)
Are you blind or missing the point? Do you read the thread title and not the actual post?
The point is he was sent a letter saying he did this, when he clearly did not, he was doing less than the speed limit, as there was a lorry infront anyway. Hopefully the photographic evidence will prove this. People like you need to learn to READ and find something called COMMON SENCE.
Any senceable suggestions?
Sure you should - unless it was a Connect, no Transit will ever do 115MPH.
Our old (2001) LWB 2.5DT could only just hit 80 with the tools in the back, and that was after a long run up!
115 in any Transit is inconceivable.
I'm quite intrigued as to how you interpreted the opening post as it being anything other than mistake.
Why would he be expecting an apology if he had actually been bombing along at 115mph?
'Awfully sorry sir, frightfully poor form of us to catch you breaking the law'
Lol, you love fox. Gay.
Surely a camera malfunction? I doubt he'd get to that speed even in a modern transit, assuming he was going reasonably slow at the lights.
Stick a copy of the letter your dad got along with an a4 peice of paper simply saying "LOL?" and mail it back, see what happens next.
I'd call you a name but last time I did that to Robert G I got fired for 2 days. Well worth it mind.
Been sorely tempted myself![]()
![]()
I think it was mroe likely that he was following Robbie G doing a top speed run in first gear.
New cars are faster doncha know.
Yeah and iirc, on your return from the cold you claimed you do 'what you want when you want' or something equally as boorish, yet refrained from calling me more names even though you must have been itching to do so. Presumably a temper is something you struggle with as well as a lack of diplomacy?!
Yeah and iirc, on your return from the cold you claimed you do 'what you want when you want' or something equally as boorish, yet refrained from calling me more names even though you must have been itching to do so. Presumably a temper is something you struggle with as well as a lack of diplomacy?
Oh please do, I simply can't wait to hear your witty northern banter.
Oh look, it's -Add- chipping in again. Take your inferiority complex elsewhere please!
Who lit the fuse on this guy's tampon?
I just love to argue, sue me!
Do you think I should put that on my CV, Mr. Expert?
Who lit the fuse on this guy's tampon?