Every dog is an individual dog, regardless of breed.
You seem to be missing the point. You said...
I know what I said...and it is true. Nothing you have said changes that. It would be foolish to consider every dog equally as they are not all equal.
There is no considering to be done when it comes to breeds as pets and esp around children because no dog is to be trusted. Every single dog is a risk, regardless of breed. Take the saffy as an example, well known nanny dogs, great with children as a breed, far more so than a poodle even (poodles are viscious blighters) but it's still a dog and not to be trusted.
Except that is not actually the case is it.....if a Papillion bites you it will be significantly less severe than if a bull terrier bites you.....
No one said that individual dogs are to be trusted....please actually read the entire thread before making a fool of yourself.
You also have to consider what the breed was actually bred for as well....it isn't as simple as blaming the owners or attributing training to a dog......some breeds are bred for specific traits and therefore those innate traits need to be considered....a fighting breed will be innately more risk than a bloodhound breed for example.
A breed bred for its guard-dog traits may well be a loyal and innately protective and safe breed for its owner and family, but may pose a risk to an outsider...for example the dog thinks that it's owners (child) is being attacked by the owners friend (child) when in fact they are merely playing.....the risk is apparent.
This is not to say that individual dogs will always be this way, or that individual dogs from different breeds will not, but it does mean that the breed of the dog should always be considered in regard to the likelihood of inconsistency of expected and/or acceptable behaviour.