Star Wars Jedi: Survivor (fallen order sequel)

willhub said:
Reading this, it makes me wonder why anyone hands over their hard earned cash for it. It's like paying for stress.
Click to expand...
Well I only paid £15 so at least I can enjoy other games with EA Play Pro. I would definitely not buy it for full price.

A half competent PC QA team would have caught many of these issues in five minutes though. I can only conclude that most development studios don't have one.
 
Last edited:
I don't get why some people in here are defending the game. For a start it's published by EA. Yes the game is most likely excellent. Props to the writers and the gameplay developers and all those involved, but games are a package and a piece of software. If the performance is not up to par the entire package should be halted until they get it up to par before selling it to you, and it probably is not their fault it will always be the executives and the business that push these deadlines. I'm glad its running great for some of you, but realistically you probably have a monster rig and even being truthful your rig is probably not being utilized as it should be so it should be running even better for you.

Apparently reports now coming in that the console versions are also not great in terms of performance either.

I will still buy this game, but I'm done buying games at release and being their beta tester for free.
 
Dem2k said:
I don't get why some people in here are defending the game. For a start it's published by EA. Yes the game is most likely excellent. Props to the writers and the gameplay developers and all those involved, but games are a package and a piece of software. If the performance is not up to par the entire package should be halted until they get it up to par before selling it to you, and it probably is not their fault it will always be the executives and the business that push these deadlines. I'm glad its running great for some of you, but realistically you probably have a monster rig and even being truthful your rig is probably not being utilized as it should be so it should be running even better for you.

Apparently reports now coming in that the console versions are also not great in terms of performance either.

I will still buy this game, but I'm done buying games at release and being their beta tester for free.
Click to expand...
And this game costs £50 or so
 
Dem2k said:
I don't get why some people in here are defending the game. For a start it's published by EA. Yes the game is most likely excellent. Props to the writers and the gameplay developers and all those involved, but games are a package and a piece of software. If the performance is not up to par the entire package should be halted until they get it up to par before selling it to you, and it probably is not their fault it will always be the executives and the business that push these deadlines. I'm glad its running great for some of you, but realistically you probably have a monster rig and even being truthful your rig is probably not being utilized as it should be so it should be running even better for you.

Apparently reports now coming in that the console versions are also not great in terms of performance either.

I will still buy this game, but I'm done buying games at release and being their beta tester for free.
Click to expand...
I'm defending it because for me it works out of the box at 4k and no stuttering or bugs. I did around 3 hours today and faced no issues at all.

And no monster rig either, its a several year old 2080ti
 
Last edited:
:cry:
dtb0d1djlnwa1.jpg
 
Name said:
lol this sounds like a Jab at windows 10 users.
"We optimized the game for windows 11 you morons!"
Click to expand...
You'd really think they'd QA it across multiple configurations. There are a lot of people running 3000 series or even 4000 series on older CPU's and staying on windows 10. I'm still on 10 as well. Odd numbered Windows versions scare me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom