Caporegime
Ultimately this will happen until the cost to shareholders and investors from strikes exceeds the cost of paying them more.
What would happen if all the baggage handlers did go find another job? What would that do to peoples precious holidays?
Salaries would rise to attract more people into the job. This is exactly what happened with lorry drivers after Brexit when a lot of previous drivers went home. There was a temporary shortage of workers in that industry so wages increased significantly to attract more people.What would happen if all the baggage handlers did go find another job? What would that do to peoples precious holidays?
This is exactly what I do. I take a 30L backpack wherever I go. I refuse to take anything larger. I even took it on a business trip earlier in the year. A colleague who was also using only carry on was still asked to check their rolling suitcase as there wasn't enough room in the overhead bins. But as I only had a backpack they ignored me and I just put it under the seat. Ultralight and onebag are the way to go.One bag is the way to go tbh, so much quicker and easier. No risk of your stuff going missing either.
The people striking are 'Joe Public'.I’m getting fed up with all the strikes going on. Always holding the Joe Public at ransom. All these trade unions telling their members to strike if they don’t get what they want
Salaries would rise to attract more people into the job. This is exactly what happened with lorry drivers after Brexit when a lot of previous drivers went home. There was a temporary shortage of workers in that industry so wages increased significantly to attract more people.
Yes. The negative side of it was that it contributed to inflation. But it absolutely did show that wages had been kept low due to cheaper foreign labour. I'm not arguing for or against the EU/Brexit here. Just agreeing that membership had kept wages down....and showed the effects foreign drivers had on wages in the UK. Companies were able to pay overseas drivers, mainly eastern European, lower wage rates, keeping them low over here.
It was worth price rises in some retail sectors for British drivers to attract a reasonable wage.
Genuine question... if the pay is poor (and it does seem to be from your example) then why don't they get a different job?
Whenever I have wanted or needed a pay rise I have moved jobs.
I don't have that opinion with vocational work such as nursing (pay them triple what they currently earn). But a private company job like this? Just go and get a different job for more money. If you don't have the skills to get another job then upskill.
if that is true that is outrageous. isn't that below minimum wage? (and should there not be a London weighting?)
(I wonder if the people in the other thread complaining that 100k isnt a high wage can reflect on what some people in the country are expected to live on.)
Salaries would rise to attract more people into the job. This is exactly what happened with lorry drivers after Brexit when a lot of previous drivers went home. There was a temporary shortage of workers in that industry so wages increased significantly to attract more people.
Yes but with a better payrise and without affecting innocent customers.So basically what striking does?
Glad I don’t have a holiday booked, it’s chaotic enough when everything works.
You don't think a mass exodus of staff would impact 'innocent customers'?Yes but with a better payrise and without affecting innocent customers.
Possibly, short term, in the same way that my example of lorry drivers caused some short term inconvenience. Once it becomes a trend then wages would rise to stop it.You don't think a mass exodus of staff would impact 'innocent customers'?
No, it’s not short term. Strikes are short term, they last days or weeks.Possibly, short term, in the same way that my example of lorry drivers caused some short term inconvenience. Once it becomes a trend then wages would rise to stop it.
i realise on average it is above the minimum wage but i thought if you lived in London you got an increase on top. I wasnt sure however which is why i asked the question.Most jobs have similar poor pay, those that do pay better don't have unlimited hiring potential.
Not everyone can be a "VP of marketing", "HR manager" or whatever useless title pays better. They weren't the essential workers during covid, were they?
People will still have to do these jobs, so "get a better job" doesn't actually solve the issue of **** jobs with **** pay existing. Unless we just shut down every shop, airport, restaurant etc.
No?
£12 an hour * 37.5h (full time) is £450 pre tax, £383 post tax. Min wage is £10.42, which is £342 a week take home.
Just commute from Hull to Gatwick, EZi realise on average it is above the minimum wage but i thought if you lived in London you got an increase on top. I wasnt sure however which is why i asked the question.
whilst £12 an hr is a livable wage in Hull i can accept that london would be a different beast entirely.... and whilst you could use the argument dont live in london then, and that may even work for office jobs where WFH is supported, for manual jobs that isnt the case.