Its quite a bit further down the line then that, i know that my initial post didnt contain much detail. At this point we have had a final survey completed which was a floor slab distortion survey. Looks like a Topographical map, im just wondering what the scale of it is.As in caused by trees? I've dealt with a few of these over my years. IF it is trees, the usual recommendation is cut them down!
Chimney is central mass of the house, not built with any sort of foundation just on the floorslab, and we are on clay. House built in the 50's and really doesnt take much, with the more extreme dry summers and wet winters its just slowly getting worse.What is the cause accordng to the survey? Slab movement is usually undermined by something like water leak, big roots etc.
Root ingress holes internally dug and investigated right at the chimney.I'm surprised that a property built in the 1950s doesn't have foundations to the chim. How have no foundations been established? Pulled the floors up?
I’ll get pics going when we have a confirmed full pla of action. The main issue is floor distortion, our concrete slab floor has 50-55mm distortion within 4m of the zero point. So it’s not even like it’s a suspended floor on wooden beams, which is why it has to be fully excavated and replaced.I would love to see some pics of the issues if you're allowed to show it...
I didn’t ask for subsidence and I didn’t plan the suggested work, not much I can do except explain to them the situation.Your neighbours are gonna hate you lol.
Why doesn't the insurance company sort it all for you? Surely you pay your premium not just to be able to be reimbursed financially but for their expertise in sorting and arranging the work etc? Sounds like you have had to do a lot of organising?
I dont want to say for now, but I will once we have had everything resolved. The insurer isnt the actual challenge point here, its the loss adjusters that are really making everything really difficult.Which insurer is it if you don’t mind me asking?











Yes that is very much the case that if the cause of the subs is removed and monitoring shows that the property is table then underpinning is not a requirement. This is the reason no work is being carried out under insurance on my chimney. However my chimney has no foundations and is a massive part of the house we dont use, so we have reason to remove it.Sorry to hijack your thread but we currently have a subsidence claim in with the insurance which has been dragging on for over a year now.
The front corner of the bungalow has sagged and a crack appeared in the front wall, inside and out. The culprit was identified as a nearby willow tree, which has now been cut down.
Our query is that they say because it was a tree that caused it, which has now been removed, they don't underpin the house but are just injecting the crack with "helical crack bond resin" - is that normal procedure?
Also about 3/4 down the side wall, the sagging front corner has obviously caused pressure and there's a line of cracked bricks - shouldn't these be sorted as well?