Care to source that claim?
In any event, we didn't bomb the Syrians for the last two years, so I would expect even the most casual observer to have figured out it's the use of chemical weapons that created the pretext for this.
As I've already explained in this thread, civilians dying to conventional weapons can be argued down to collateral damage, unless there is strong evidence to the contrary. You cannot make that argument with chemical weapons.
Libya is actually an example of our taking action against a nation who were clearly going to kill civilians. The move was not altogether selfish either, as Gaddafi was actually something of a Western stooge after 9/11.
And then what happens? Take a look at iraq now.
If we don't know who used the chemical weapons how do you know that Assad has them is a massive lie?
reading comprehension lvl 0
Alternatively it is your writing ability that is at fault...
we don't even know who used chemical weapons, we are being told only assad has them which is a massive lie
Care to source that claim?
In any event, we didn't bomb the Syrians for the last two years, so I would expect even the most casual observer to have figured out it's the use of chemical weapons that created the pretext for this.
As I've already explained in this thread, civilians dying to conventional weapons can be argued down to collateral damage, unless there is strong evidence to the contrary. You cannot make that argument with chemical weapons.
Libya is actually an example of our taking action against a nation who were clearly going to kill civilians. The move was not altogether selfish either, as Gaddafi was actually something of a Western stooge after 9/11.
I think maybe Assad didn't authorise the attack and it was probably some dumb fool beneath him.
what happens if you bomb a chemical production or storage facility, does that run the risk of contaminating the air ?
sounding like cameron is gonna wait for the u.n. inspectors report now.
For what, leading the country and making decisions? Im no supporter of Cameron but for once I admire the guy for doing something when everyone else is more afraid that their fuel will go up 2p than actually saving some lives. Those ignorants who think doing nothing when someone uses a WMD means the problem will stay in one country. The pathetics willing to turn a blind eye to murdered women and children because they live far away.
What can be achieved? Destroy the SAA command and control and certain military bases and depots and damascus will definitely fall. Most importantly send the message that there is an actual red line and people who wont let it be crossed without punishment.