Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?


  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
terrorists-with-chem-weapons.jpg
 
If there is verifiable, significant and new evidence that wasn't considered in the first vote then it would be incumbent on Parliament to consider this evidence and make a decision based on it.

There is no "verifiable, significant and new evidence", just turds like Kerry spouting lies and thinking people will fall for another dodgy dossier.
 
Monday 06 May 2013


A United Nations inquiry into human rights abuses in Syria has found evidence that rebel forces may have used chemical weapons, its lead investigator has revealed.

Carla Del Ponte, a member of the UN Independent Commission of Inquiry on Syria, said that testimony gathered from casualties and medical staff indicated that the nerve agent sarin was used by rebel fighters.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/w...els-may-have-used-sarin-in-syria-8604920.html

Wonder if she still has a job?
 
America aren't even planning the deployment of ground troops, so it's not really that big of a deal (in the sense of putting people in harms way).
 
I hope they attack Syria, regardless of who did this last attack, from reading around seems there have been quite a few uses of chemical weapons in the region in the past. I would hope they also add a few other Arab countries to the list..can't see what good they add to the world all they seem to add is trouble!
 
I hope they attack Syria, regardless of who did this last attack, from reading around seems there have been quite a few uses of chemical weapons in the region in the past. I would hope they also add a few other Arab countries to the list..can't see what good they add to the world all they seem to add is trouble!

Good job your not in charge of the country.

Strikes won't deter anything, just cause destablization around the world.
 
Back
Top Bottom