Poll: Syrian Chemical Weapon Attack

Would you support a military strike on Syria without a UN Security Council resolution?

  • Total voters
    828
  • Poll closed .
VoG said:
It's turned out to be a joint Israeli/American missile test, as confirmed by Israel them selves.
Click to expand...

Well that makes sense, conducting a missile test off the coast of a country you regularly attack/bully at a time when tensions are very high sounds like a smart idea >.>
 
VoG said:
It's turned out to be a joint Israeli/American missile test, as confirmed by Israel them selves.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/middle-east-live/2013/sep/03/syria-crisis-2-million-refugees-live
Click to expand...

So basically it's just Russia announcing to the world that they're keeping their eye on the Med / doing their usual drama queens. I seriously doubt that any first strikes against Syria will be ballistic missiles.

While Russia is messing about with these non-stories and backing their brutal dictator buddy, the number of refugees from Syria is estimated to be 2m. Instead of being obsessed with looking like an international strong man, maybe Mr Putin would care to comment on the plight of these people. Thought not.
 
Last edited:
scorza said:
So basically it's just Russia announcing to the world that they're keeping their eye on the Med / doing their usual drama queens. I seriously doubt that any first strikes against Syria will be ballistic missiles.

While Russia is messing about with these non-stories and backing their brutal dictator buddy, the number of refugees from Syria is estimated to be 2m. Instead of being obsessed with looking like an international strong man, maybe Mr Putin would care to comment on the plight of these people. Thought not.
Click to expand...

fail
 
scorza said:
So basically it's just Russia announcing to the world that they're keeping their eye on the Med / doing their usual drama queens. I seriously doubt that any first strikes against Syria will be ballistic missiles.

While Russia is messing about with these non-stories and backing their brutal dictator buddy, the number of refugees from Syria is estimated to be 2m. Instead of being obsessed with looking like an international strong man, maybe Mr Putin would care to comment on the plight of these people. Thought not.
Click to expand...

How would allowing the terrorists to take over their country help ?
 
scorza said:
So basically it's just Russia announcing to the world that they're keeping their eye on the Med / doing their usual drama queens. I seriously doubt that any first strikes against Syria will be ballistic missiles.

While Russia is messing about with these non-stories and backing their brutal dictator buddy, the number of refugees from Syria is estimated to be 2m. Instead of being obsessed with looking like an international strong man, maybe Mr Putin would care to comment on the plight of these people. Thought not.
Click to expand...

So Churchill/others should have simply given up the countries the Nazi's took and ours if they came here, to save the plight of the people who are displaced during wars? Does that logic really make sense to you? You don't give up a country to a bunch of terrorists because you both won't improve those refugee's lives(try looking at how Lybians are living right now thanks to our help against a supposed madman), you're also putting many millions, maybe hundreds of millions of lives on the line by handing a terrorist supported group power in a volatile region.

Yeah, Putin is so stupid not thinking about the current refugee's, hand the terrorists a huge amount of power, political sway, money, resources on a platter to absolutely not improve those refugee's lives in any way at all, brilliant.
 
scorza said:
So basically it's just Russia announcing to the world that they're keeping their eye on the Med / doing their usual drama queens. I seriously doubt that any first strikes against Syria will be ballistic missiles.

While Russia is messing about with these non-stories and backing their brutal dictator buddy, the number of refugees from Syria is estimated to be 2m. Instead of being obsessed with looking like an international strong man, maybe Mr Putin would care to comment on the plight of these people. Thought not.
Click to expand...

brain-dead.
 
thep02 said:
Peter Hitchens (the right wing brother) view of camoron and the shamefully biased bbc, not good, I wish I could stop paying the license fee.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/a...d-Cameron-vainglorious-fantasist-He-quit.html
Click to expand...

The BBC's coverage is totally unacceptable. They're continuously putting forward a case for war and attempting to change attitudes through their reporting. It is nothing short of propaganda.

Needless to say the government are pulling a few strings.
 
I really wish people would either put up, or shut up

Remember North Korea....all talk

What are the Russians gonna do? Launch Nukes? No, they aren't going to do anything!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom