Tennis

The difference between Emma and Iga yesterday was huge. She resorts to moonballing when under pressure, something no-one else does at that level and usually gets punished for it.
When she won the US open she had a lethal 2-handed backhand down the line, needs to find that form again and be aggressive. As soon as she hits moonballs its over.
I wouldn't say that she fluked the US Open, but everything went her way. She came into qualifying, played out of her skin, and her confidence just grew and grew. I've played most of the big sports in my life (with tennis and cricket being the two I've ever particularly excelled at), and tennis is the most mental game out there. If you're confident, it feels like the easiest thing in the world. If something goes, everything goes.

The greats aren't significantly different to any other top 100 player technically. But they've got something in them that allows them to control their emotions to an almost inhuman extent. When everything went Emma's way, she hit better than anyone. Now she's not, and she's lost confidence, isn't driving through balls, and has therefore lost both power and control and seems to be spiralling.

That US Open win was a freak event. Not because Emma is less technically proficient than other players, but because everything conspired to maximise her confidence. She's now in a position where she needs to really decide whether she wants to work - really hard - to get her head to where it needs to be for sustained success, or whether she's happy being average and hoping for another freak win.
 
it is a percentage game and extremely rare outcomes are not impossible. Trying to decide if Greece winning Euro in 2004 or Emma winning the US open was more extreme.
 
it is a percentage game and extremely rare outcomes are not impossible. Trying to decide if Greece winning Euro in 2004 or Emma winning the US open was more extreme.

Latter easily, pre tournament odds would give it to Emma.

I said a while back as well, even the girl she played in the final has only got beyond the 3rd round once.

It was incredible that tournament they both - more so E.R - had the world at their feet.
 
About time the GB public stopped sleeping on Jack Draper, the lads mustard.

This eras much weaker than the big 4 era so he has a real chance of winning some slams.
 
Close sets, but Sinner gets a 3-0 win over Novax, to meet Alcaraz in the final.

I watched bits a bobs of it. Feel it’s the end of Novax or very close to it. Still incredible he’s able to get to the SF at an almost canter all the way.

Still a bit annoying that Sinner got a pass for this but the final should be good with the two best in the world.
 
I watched bits a bobs of it. Feel it’s the end of Novax or very close to it. Still incredible he’s able to get to the SF at an almost canter all the way.

Still a bit annoying that Sinner got a pass for this but the final should be good with the two best in the world.

Bear in mind it wasn't even a year ago Novak was beating Alcaraz on that very court he just lost Sinner on. IIRC Novak has won the 4 of the last 5 matches against Alcaraz whilst losing 4 of the last 5 against Sinner. It's all about game styles.

That being said. It's going to take something him to win another GS. He really needs Sinner and Alcaraz in the same side of the draw, giving him a clear path to the final.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, if this is what men's tennis is going to look like for the next 5-10 years I may need to take a break from watching it. It's like Sinner was created by a data scientist. He's so outrageously dull to watch
 
Honestly, if this is what men's tennis is going to look like for the next 5-10 years I may need to take a break from watching it. It's like Sinner was created by a data scientist. He's so outrageously dull to watch
Odd as most of games have been relatively close each set
 
Back
Top Bottom