The 800x600 MAXIMUM screenshot thread (56k no no)

Tombo · 4 Apr 2007 at 23:58

MoNkEyMiKeY said:
Maybe its just me having a 8800gtx but it runs as smooth as a babies bottom.

Same, only real difference between mine and your systems is the card.

Bones · 5 Apr 2007 at 00:01

Supcom

agnes · 5 Apr 2007 at 00:40

starting from scratch again

ags

BloodWolf · 5 Apr 2007 at 02:29

agnes said:
starting from scratch again

ags

Amazing setup you're running it on. Hows it run?

Sime · 5 Apr 2007 at 02:45

BloodWolf said:
Amazing setup you're running it on. Hows it run?

lol with a setup like that, I hope it would run "Good"

agnes · 5 Apr 2007 at 12:00

BloodWolf said:
Amazing setup you're running it on. Hows it run?

runs like treacle tart, smooth, no hitches, no glitches, just sweet pleasure.... :eek:

reality check, i need a life

just started playing cnc3 and saw this section for the first time and remembered everyone posting pics of it, so heres mine.

ags

khimbar · 5 Apr 2007 at 12:14

SiD the Turtle said:
Ha ha is it just me or is every Stalker picture in this thread of a extremely high detail brick wall or fence?

Is there a game or is it Wall Simulator 2007?

Standing in the pouring rain on top of a hill, looking down over desolate, depressed towns, hoping not to be jumped by angry locals and inbred animals...I thought it was a Cumbria Simulator?

schnipps · 5 Apr 2007 at 12:28

Bones said:
Supcom

Very Pretty, what rez and settings and also do you use the mini UI all the time and have you tried the Sorian UI mod?

Bones · 5 Apr 2007 at 12:59

running in 1680x1050, max settings x2 AA x16Af. sys spec is x2 3800 @2.5 8800GTS, 2gb mushkin

I have only played over lan with a friend as i seem to have huge problems connecting to GPgnet

I only found the new UI a couple of days ago. Do you have a link to the UI mod you mentioned

NutritioN · 5 Apr 2007 at 14:02

Mephisto said:
I thing I found with STALKER is that yes, the walls look all nice and bumpy...etc, but you don't even notice it unless you stop what you're doing, go right up to the wall and perhaps turn on your torch. Just seems like a bit of a waste of resources tbh. No wonder it runs so poorly and yet doesn't seem to look all that great.

1.It looks great in motion, imo a great looking game considering the dismal surroundings.

2.For what the engine achieves/does I think it runs pretty well.

3.It's the little details that processes such as parallax mapping can bring out that make a game world more solid/realistic/immersive.

Playing @1280 800 on 1900xt 512Mb Opty165 2gig Ram

schnipps · 5 Apr 2007 at 14:27

Bones said:
running in 1680x1050, max settings x2 AA x16Af. sys spec is x2 3800 @2.5 8800GTS, 2gb mushkin

I have only played over lan with a friend as i seem to have huge problems connecting to GPgnet I only found the new UI a couple of days ago. Do you have a link to the UI mod you mentioned

Yep its here http://forums.gaspowered.com/viewtopic.php?t=59

Worth a scout about the official forums as there is also a map pack, has a nice map called 'Fast Wars' where there is a big grid of Mass next to your base so you can have a nice huge whacking battle without worrying about resources

titaniumx3 · 5 Apr 2007 at 17:28

Those SupCom screens look very tasty, so much so I might just have a game right now!

I also just finished Stalker and what a blast, honestly it's in my top 10 best games ever. That said there's still quite a few minor, but annoying bugs in the game and near the end for some strange reason the AI were acting a little silly.

geeza · 5 Apr 2007 at 20:54

Bones said:
running in 1680x1050, max settings x2 AA x16Af. sys spec is x2 3800 @2.5 8800GTS, 2gb mushkin

I have only played over lan with a friend as i seem to have huge problems connecting to GPgnet I only found the new UI a couple of days ago. Do you have a link to the UI mod you mentioned

how does it run on your system? Ive got an X2 3800 clocked at 2.8ghz, 2gb memory and an X1800xt. I run in high but n 1024x768. Runs ok but not amazing. what sort of fps are you getting because those screens look loads better than mine

Naffa · 6 Apr 2007 at 00:24

Smeg4Brains said:
snip

If that's an emulator, which I think it is, then you should take it down as it's not allowed on here.

z0mbi3 · 6 Apr 2007 at 00:29

naffa said:
If that's an emulator, which I think it is, then you should take it down as it's not allowed on here.

Allowed or not this is the pc screenshot thread, not consoles. Shouldn't be here on principle.

Minstadave · 6 Apr 2007 at 00:29

naffa said:
If that's an emulator, which I think it is, then you should take it down as it's not allowed on here.

Indeed, removed.

Bones · 6 Apr 2007 at 03:59

geeza said:
how does it run on your system? Ive got an X2 3800 clocked at 2.8ghz, 2gb memory and an X1800xt. I run in high but n 1024x768. Runs ok but not amazing. what sort of fps are you getting because those screens look loads better than mine

Runs fine 1v1, 500 limit. Things do get a little juttery when playing multiple CPU's. It must be your graphics card thats letting you down i reckon, the image quality with the 8800 is very nice

Currently at i30 and just had a game against a mate, i'll pop some screenies up when i can.

BloodWolf · 7 Apr 2007 at 00:18

Found a classic, imo..

Mephisto · 7 Apr 2007 at 00:29

LOL! I'm going to have to get that game just because it has sharks in it. It's Scarface, right?

benjo · 7 Apr 2007 at 00:36