The 800x600 MAXIMUM screenshot thread (56k no no)

Darkwave · 31 Mar 2007 at 01:12

Slyvester said:
Click to enlarge.

No matter how hard I click, they're only 320x240.

silversurfer · 31 Mar 2007 at 01:14

If only games ran that res, I could have just kept my ti4200 :/

mr.sly · 31 Mar 2007 at 01:14

Macabre said:
^Is C&C 3 worth getting?

Everything I've wanted so far.

Going back on to play in a minute can't wait for NOD. If you enjoy C&C I'd definitely recommend getting it.

And I'll go back and edit the above posts when I've uploaded the images again (after an hour, thanks Virgin

).

Macabre · 31 Mar 2007 at 01:18

Slyvester said:
Everything I've wanted so far. Going back on to play in a minute can't wait for NOD. If you enjoy C&C I'd definitely recommend getting it.

And I'll go back and edit the above posts when I've uploaded the images again (after an hour, thanks Virgin ).

If you've played COH, I think that game owns, is it like that? gameplay structure wise, like I found COH easy to navigate and use since im not really a big RTS player.

mr.sly · 31 Mar 2007 at 01:30

Macabre said:
If you've played COH, I think that game owns, is it like that? gameplay structure wise, like I found COH easy to navigate and use since im not really a big RTS player.

Yeah loved CoH, it's not as tactical. It's still very much build as much as you can and rush them. But I'm still near the start so it might change I'm not sure.

mr.sly · 31 Mar 2007 at 01:36

Command and Conquer 3

Edited the posts on the last page as well.

m@rty · 31 Mar 2007 at 01:38

titaniumx3 said:
No its an x1900xt. I'm running at 1280x1024 with maximum details (just view distance lowered a bit). I get about 25-60fps like this.

how the hell are you managing that. im using an x1950xt and anything above medium and it is pretty much unplayable... oh and im only running it in 1024x768!!!

titaniumx3 · 31 Mar 2007 at 01:45

m@rty said:
how the hell are you managing that. im using an x1950xt and anything above medium and i get pretty bad fps... oh and im only running it in 1024x768

I have no idea but I get 35fps on average with the usual stutter when loading new areas (everyone gets that I think). The game is unusually playable even at 25 fps so its not exactly running silky smooth but its still very playable. Maybe its a memory bottleneck since the x1950xt only has 256mb?

(I'm using the Cat 6.12 drivers btw)

m@rty · 31 Mar 2007 at 01:47

maybe i should try it again and just fiddle with the settings till it's playable. im also using the 6.12 drivers as the newer drivers seemed to be worse for me and games were freezing and stuff when i was exiting them...

Spend_day · 31 Mar 2007 at 22:08

ive taken some screenies in stalker but cant find em any ideas where they are stored any1

Hector · 31 Mar 2007 at 22:12

Spend_day said:
ive taken some screenies in stalker but cant find em any ideas where they are stored any1

C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\STALKER-SHOC\screenshots\

Coolasmoo · 31 Mar 2007 at 22:19

Hector said:
C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\STALKER-SHOC\screenshots\

And just incase, Vista:

c:\users\public\public documents\STALKER-SHOC\screenshots

Spend_day · 31 Mar 2007 at 22:38

Hector said:
C:\Documents and Settings\All Users\Documents\STALKER-SHOC\screenshots\

ty

benjo · 31 Mar 2007 at 23:35

Love this game

SiD the Turtle · 31 Mar 2007 at 23:54

Nod's key weakness has always been leaving explosive barrels amongst their forces:

Even in the future, copyright theft is a crime (red box added by me):

Mammoths == Win:

This would have been a much easier fight if three quarters of the force weren't lagging behind:

GazD · 1 Apr 2007 at 22:54

Scarecrow seen on the Battlefield.

Macabre · 1 Apr 2007 at 23:05

^Thought they sorted that bug.

Easy enough to do.

GazD · 1 Apr 2007 at 23:15

Macabre said:
^Thought they sorted that bug.

Easy enough to do.

I didnt know it was a bug or how to do it, I just revived my mate and then he was running round like a Premiership Striker that had scored.

Macabre · 1 Apr 2007 at 23:22

GazD said:
I didnt know it was a bug or how to do it, I just revived my mate and then he was running round like a Premiership Striker that had scored.

lol, yeah the way to do it is when someone dies take their kit and then keep moving back taking their kit then yours etc, until your about 15 yards back then run and revive them before they respawn, they will have no kit, and be like a zombie or w.e lol.

1mm3 · 2 Apr 2007 at 01:14

GazD said:
Scarecrow seen on the Battlefield.

lol, never seen that one before (never really got into bf2 for some reason)