• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The AMD Driver Thread

New tech preview with even more FSR4 supported games! :eek:

AMD FSR Technical Preview: Expanded Game Support Release Notes​

Article Number: RN-RAD-WIN-FSR-TECH-PREVIEW

Welcome to the AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution 4 (FSR 4) Technical Preview​

This driver lets you test our next-generation, ML-powered upscaler on even more titles. You can upgrade over 60 games from FSR 3.1 to FSR 4 for image quality improvements on Radeon™ RX 9000 graphics cards. Learn more about FSR 4 by reading our blog HERE.

We encourage you to provide feedback through the AMD Bug Report Tool. If any persistent issues occur while using the preview driver, please use the AMD Auto-Detect and Install Tool to revert to the latest recommended version of AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition.

Expanded Game Support for AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution 4​

This preview expands FSR 4 support to over 60 titles. View the list of supported titles below (new additions in bold).

Game Name​

1 A Quiet Place: The Road Ahead
2 ARK: Survival Ascended
3 Assassin’s Creed Shadows
4 Bellwright
5 Blades of Fire
6 Call of Duty®: Black Ops 6
7 Call of Duty®: Warzone™
8 Creatures of Ava
9 Deadzone: Rogue
10 DragonKin: The Banished
11 Dynasty Warriors: Origins
12 Enotria: The Last Song
13 EVERSPACE™ 2
14 F1® 25
15 Fort Solis
16 FragPunk
17 Frostpunk 2
18 Funko Fusion
19 Ghost of Tsushima DIRECTOR’S CUT
20 God of War Ragnarök
21 Horizon Forbidden West™ Complete Edition
22 Horizon Zero Dawn™ Remastered
23 Hunt: Showdown 1896
24 Incursion: Red River
25 InFlux Redux
26 inZOI
27 Kingdom Come: Deliverance II
28 Kristala
29 Legacy: Steel & Sorcery
30 Lords of the Fallen
31 Marvel Rivals
32 Marvel’s Spider-Man 2
33 Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
34 Marvel’s Spider-Man: Miles Morales
35 MechWarrior 5: Clans
36 NARAKA: BLADEPOINT
37 Nightingale
38 NINJA GAIDEN 2 Black
39 No More Room in Hell 2
40 PANICORE
41 Planetaries
42 Predator: Hunting Grounds
43 QANGA
44 Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
45 REM Survival
46 REMNANT II
47 RoadCraft
48 RuneScape: Dragonwilds
49 S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: Heart of Chornobyl
50 Sid Meier’s Civilization VII
51 Silent Hill 2
52 SMITE 2
53 Star Wars Outlaws
54 Steel Seed
55 Stellar Blade™
56 The Axis Unseen
57 The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion Remastered
58 THE FINALS
59 The Last of Us™ Part I
60 The Last of Us™ Part II Remastered
61 Until Dawn™
62 Virtua Fighter 5 R.E.V.O
63 Warhammer 40,000: Darktide
64 Warhammer 40,000: Space Marine 2
65 Wild Assault

Fixes and Improvements​

  • This preview includes the same changes from AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition 25.6.1 release, including support for AMD Radeon™ RX 9060 XT GPUs.

Known Issues​

  • AMD Software: Adrenalin Edition may not automatically create a per-game profile for Blades of Fire and Dragonkin: The Banished. Users are recommended to enable AMD FidelityFX™ Super Resolution 4 from the global graphics settings as a temporary workaround.

What’s Next?​

  • We are continuously refining FSR, using feedback from gamers across a vast library of games to drive innovation. Tell us how FSR 4 perform on your system through the Bug Report Tool or the AMD Community forums—your feedback directly shapes the next update.

Package Contents​

  • AMD FSR Technical Preview Driver Version 25.10.13.02 for Windows® 10 and Windows® 11 (Windows Driver Store Version 32.0.21013.2006). 



 
RavenXXX2 said:
I guess games like cyberpunk and bmw that are heavily Nvidia sponsored will not get built in fsr4.
Click to expand...

Wasn't there a tweet involving both companies recently that AMD would be working with them closer? I might be remembering it wrong - maybe with FSR Redstone introducing the AMD equivalent of Ray Reconstruction we could see an update?
 
CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
Wasn't there a tweet involving both companies recently that AMD would be working with them closer? I might be remembering it wrong - maybe with FSR Redstone introducing the AMD equivalent of Ray Reconstruction we could see an update?
Click to expand...
I don't know why they want to add this to cyberpunk, who still plays this old game now. People have moved on.
 
Raelgun said:
It really isn't, its an old single player game.

Its really is a waste of resources where they can focus on working with devs with new current games and games coming out in the future, not a rubbish old game.
Click to expand...
Is CP2077 still used as a benchmark by reviewers? If so I'd say it is still needed as well.
 
Firegod said:
Is CP2077 still used as a benchmark by reviewers? If so I'd say it is still needed as well.
Click to expand...
It's an old game that AMD is wasting resources on. Benchmarks are useful for people who want to buy games and these usually mean new games which cyberpunk isn't accountable for because it's a trash made game and took 5 years to be fixed and still being fixed by the devs to this date.

You shouldn't use a broken old game as a benchmark.

Most reviewers don't even play games as well sadly too know the history of cyberpunk.
 
what if cyberpunk was one of the games you play most?
still use a different game as the decider for which card to buy?
lol if its the game you play a lot then surely it is the one you should be looking at bench marks for no?

edit just realised you meant for developers to spend resources working on ok lol yeah that makes more sense
 
Last edited:
ive noticed on the new drivers my vram overclock i can't go anywhere near as high before the system just hard resets i can now only get to 2688 or something and im suddenly randomly staring into darkness lol
 
Raelgun said:
It really isn't, its an old single player game.

Its really is a waste of resources where they can focus on working with devs with new current games and games coming out in the future, not a rubbish old game.
Click to expand...

You make a silly statement, then you compound it by making two more silly statements.

First. Getting FSR4 into as many games as possible should be AMD's goal. It's not just about getting FSR4 into the game, it also means getting their name out there and working with more developers. Work on Cyberpunk 2077 now, get into their next game earlier. Putting it into new games only would be a terrible strategy for AMD, especially when older games are still extremely popular.

Second, like or hate, doesn't matter. Cyberpunk is still one of the most talked about games out there. It's also has overwhelmingly positive reviews by players. And it's still one of the hardest to run games. Getting FSR4 into that game and showing how good it can be, would be fantastic for AMD.

Third: It's not an OLD game. It had a DLC in 2023 and another DLC coming in the next month or so. So, again, it wouldn't be a waste for people returning to the game or playing it for the first time.

Fourth: More people have played Cyberpunk 2077 in the last 24 hours than any game that supports FS4 outside of Call Of Duty and Marvel's Rivals. And that's just the Steam player base. It's a popular game that people are still playing in large numbers. So it should be a priority.

Fifth: Why do you say "single player" like it's a bad thing? Nobody playing competitive multiplayer games is going to be using any kind of upscaling. Upscaling benefits single player games the most.

Raelgun said:
It's an old game that AMD is wasting resources on. Benchmarks are useful for people who want to buy games and these usually mean new games which cyberpunk isn't accountable for because it's a trash made game and took 5 years to be fixed and still being fixed by the devs to this date.

You shouldn't use a broken old game as a benchmark.

Most reviewers don't even play games as well sadly too know the history of cyberpunk.
Click to expand...

LOL wasting resources!! Man you keep coming out with gems. Have you looked at the list of FSR4 supported games? LOL AMD sure aren't wasting resources putting FSR4 into games like Mechwarrior 5: Clans, Kristala, INflux Redux, and other equally crappy games with tiny player bases. But you would consider it a waste of resources putting into Cyberpunk 2077, still one of the most played games out there with new DLC on the way.

Lastly, Cyberpunk isn't an old game. Not that it matters anyway. Old games are still been played in huge numbers of people. Skyrim, Red Dead redemption, Fallout 4, Borderlands 2, Witcher 3 etc. etc. Gamers are modding these games, playing them in VR and more. With some mods these games are very difficult to run even with the latest GPUs. Like the Mad Dog Overhaul makes Skyrim look amazing but is very difficult to run. The thing is Nvidia's DLSS works in these older games. But AMD's FSR4 doesn't. In some of these mods, they even recommend getting a Nvidia card for this very reason.

Getting FSR4 out there into as many games as possible should be key for AMD. And the more popular a game is the more they should prioritise it. Serious question. Do you honestly think it was better for AMD to put FSR 4 into games like the ones I listed above? Or do you think they would have been better off working on getting it into Cyberpunk2077. (I know the right answer, but will be interesting to read your reply)
 
melmac said:
You make a silly statement, then you compound it by making two more silly statements.

First. Getting FSR4 into as many games as possible should be AMD's goal. It's not just about getting FSR4 into the game, it also means getting their name out there and working with more developers. Work on Cyberpunk 2077 now, get into their next game earlier. Putting it into new games only would be a terrible strategy for AMD, especially when older games are still extremely popular.

Second, like or hate, doesn't matter. Cyberpunk is still one of the most talked about games out there. It's also has overwhelmingly positive reviews by players. And it's still one of the hardest to run games. Getting FSR4 into that game and showing how good it can be, would be fantastic for AMD.

Third: It's not an OLD game. It had a DLC in 2023 and another DLC coming in the next month or so. So, again, it wouldn't be a waste for people returning to the game or playing it for the first time.

Fourth: More people have played Cyberpunk 2077 in the last 24 hours than any game that supports FS4 outside of Call Of Duty and Marvel's Rivals. And that's just the Steam player base. It's a popular game that people are still playing in large numbers. So it should be a priority.

Fifth: Why do you say "single player" like it's a bad thing? Nobody playing competitive multiplayer games is going to be using any kind of upscaling. Upscaling benefits single player games the most.



LOL wasting resources!! Man you keep coming out with gems. Have you looked at the list of FSR4 supported games? LOL AMD sure aren't wasting resources putting FSR4 into games like Mechwarrior 5: Clans, Kristala, INflux Redux, and other equally crappy games with tiny player bases. But you would consider it a waste of resources putting into Cyberpunk 2077, still one of the most played games out there with new DLC on the way.

Lastly, Cyberpunk isn't an old game. Not that it matters anyway. Old games are still been played in huge numbers of people. Skyrim, Red Dead redemption, Fallout 4, Borderlands 2, Witcher 3 etc. etc. Gamers are modding these games, playing them in VR and more. With some mods these games are very difficult to run even with the latest GPUs. Like the Mad Dog Overhaul makes Skyrim look amazing but is very difficult to run. The thing is Nvidia's DLSS works in these older games. But AMD's FSR4 doesn't. In some of these mods, they even recommend getting a Nvidia card for this very reason.

Getting FSR4 out there into as many games as possible should be key for AMD. And the more popular a game is the more they should prioritise it. Serious question. Do you honestly think it was better for AMD to put FSR 4 into games like the ones I listed above? Or do you think they would have been better off working on getting it into Cyberpunk2077. (I know the right answer, but will be interesting to read your reply)
Click to expand...
Cyberpunk released 10 December 2020, thats nearly half a decade ago.

Singleplayer games have finite lifespan to whom actually goes out to buy it and buys hardware for it.

Who in the right mind 5 years later buys a new GPU to play a 5 year old game, like literally 5 years ago.

Cyberpunk for ages had negative and mixed reviews, what they fixed 5 years later isn't a testament lol.

AMD needs to work with developers right now for current games and upcoming games.

The last game AMD worked with a developer was Starfield and it showed with them having much better performance.

People buy Nvidia because credit to them, they actually work with developers for new and upcoming games to PC and that mind set is a hardware seller.
 
Last edited:
Then why is it THE goto benchmark for Nvidia fans users to say how wonderful RT is and how great it looks ingame in CP2077? Literally every Nvidia thread or comment about RT goes on about CP2077 as if its the greatest thing since sliced bread. Suddenly when its AMD its old hat and irrelevent? What a strange place this is.
 
Blackjack Davy said:
Then why is it THE goto benchmark for Nvidia fans users to say how wonderful RT is and how great it looks ingame in CP2077? Literally every Nvidia thread or comment about RT goes on about CP2077 as if its the greatest thing since sliced bread. Suddenly when its AMD its old hat and irrelevent? What a strange place this is.
Click to expand...
My thoughts still remain the same.

It is still irrelevant even with Nvidia cards.

Its an old game that honestly shouldn't of been used as a benchmark because the game was broken for ages.

I would even say its ray tracing is inefficient compared to modern games which actually were developed from scratch with RT.

Cyberpunk is a badly made game and still is.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom