At least there is a coil whine thread on the go.the "5080" which was released or real 5080 which doesn't exists?

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
At least there is a coil whine thread on the go.the "5080" which was released or real 5080 which doesn't exists?
Given the 5070 is rumoured to cost £549, do we think the 9070 will cost similar or more?
Given the 5070 is rumoured to cost £549, do we think the 9070 will cost similar or more?
Bargain!Hmm, well since the 5070 has 4090 performance and the 4090 is currently going for about £1800 on ebay the 9070 will cost £1750
I don't think you're far off, but feel like 699 for the 9070xt put it too close to the 5070ti msrp (which will mostly be fictional) i just think amd would be leaving the door open for too many "but dlss" or "but slightly better ray tracing" etc for people to justify paying the premium for the 5070ti. If they really want to stamp on nvidias throat it would need to be under 650, and the farther under the better £599 would be very difficult to ignoreMy blind guess:
The 9070 MBA releases at £499, offering performance between the 4070 Ti & 7900 XT. The 5070 is about 10% behind the 9070, performing closer to the 7900 GRE.
9070 XT will be £200 more, and will land a couple of points off a 4080. The performance gap vs the 5070 Ti will be smaller than 9070 vs 5070.
I'll definitely be paying for my next GPU and the rest of the pc on finance it's a no brainer for me.It can be both. I know someone who bought a 4090 on HP. Each to their own.
What ever the final price, I do believe that the 9070 and 9070XT will be at most 20% apart. All of the leaked placeholder launch prices that I've seen suggest this.My blind guess:
The 9070 MBA releases at £499, offering performance between the 4070 Ti & 7900 XT. The 5070 is about 10% behind the 9070, performing closer to the 7900 GRE.
9070 XT will be £200 more, and will land a couple of points off a 4080. The performance gap vs the 5070 Ti will be smaller than 9070 vs 5070.
What ever the final price, I do believe that the 9070 and 9070XT will be at most 20% apart. All of the leaked placeholder launch prices that I've seen suggest this.
It did cross my mind that £200 is too much of a difference based on leaked performance. The MLID benchmark leak only has the cards 13% apart, which means the XT is worse value even if there's only £100 difference.
But £499 and £599 almost seems too good to be true.
15% is typical between SKUs (tiers). The 9070 shows a roughly 30% uplift over the 78000 XT. The 9070 XT would be a similar uplift against the 7900 GRE.
The dilemma is has AMDs goals changed in pricing based on the 5000 series is massively underwhelming.
Orange man tariffs scaring people.Holy moly. RDNA 3 is selling like crazy. I guess I'm forced to wait now. XTX is sold out now in many places.
Holy moly. RDNA 3 is selling like crazy. I guess I'm forced to wait now. XTX is sold out now in many places.
I know. I didn't mean relative to norms, but relative to the nutty Nvidia 5000 series cards. AMD releasing a card which sits between the £739 5070 Ti and £979 5080 for £599 seems mental![]()
So what your saying is that AMD actually managed to do an IQ 200 4D chess move by letting nvidia sell their cards for them.. Would never have thought in a life time that would or could happen considering it relies on 2 things to happen simultaneously of which each on their own are slim chances. 1) nvidia being completely drunk at the wheel, I mean "#!"# faced and narc'd up, and 2) AMD making a correct marketing move.It’s most probably driven by ADMO (actually did miss out) and the mediocrity the 5000 series offers. People can get 5080 level of raster for half the price and don’t care about RT.