• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** The AMD RDNA 4 Rumour Mill ***

FredFlint said:
£399 --> sells fast, is very successful
£499 --> sells fast at first, add games bundle --> forums full of users selling games, price drop's
£599+ --> sells fast at first, add games bundle --> forums has 2 users selling games, forgotten (Intel smiles).
Click to expand...

Sounds about right. At £600 it will sell well for a while and get a good reception. But won't claw back the kind of market share they need to be getting back imo.

My prediction is they waited for nvidia. Now they will price it at £649 or there abouts. Die hards fans will be happy as it is cheaper than nvidia. Will sell well for 3-6 months, but it just won't move the numbers they need to to make a big dent in market share by the end of the generation.
 
Besty said:
I do keep repeating it to avoid the hype train from going out of control but anything less than £799 would be a miracle.

I have visions of humbug dancing under the shower and shouting £499! to this track

Click to expand...
Its seem obvious AMD will price it high but I don't want to believe they would be so dumb to go £799.
I think it will be £599 (none XT) and £699 for the XT.
 
CAT-THE-FIFTH said:
Hype train now back on track!
Click to expand...

giphy.gif
 
KentMan said:
Coupled with the latest news surrounding the defective silicon shipped with some 5090s the stage has never been better for AMD to hit a home run here as Nvidias shining star is dulling by the minute it seems lol


Come on AMD smash this 9xxx series out the park on price and performance
Click to expand...

They will smash something alright. Their loyal users wallets :cry:

£649+ if they have not learnt anything from the past.
 
humbug said:
That's preloading a bad review, he knows there is no way its going to be $300 less than its Nvidia competitor (in some instances half the price) he's setting unrealistic expectations because he doesn't want give it any positivity.

This petty bickering of his with AMD needs to stop.
Click to expand...
In fairness (and I've mentioned this before) but he's right.

He's not saying the card is going to be bad if it's (much) more than $550, he's saying it won't be a success. HUB calculated that AMD offered their RDNA3 cards at around 17.5% less than their competitors, and that wasn't enough to move the needle. So they need to price even lower.

Basically they need to give an option where it's just so cheap that paying more for their competition would be silly, like they did with Ryzen.
 
Last edited:
Bidley said:
In fairness (and I've mentioned this before) but he's right.

He's not saying the card is going to be bad if it's (much) more than $550, he's saying it won't be a success. HUB calculated that AMD offered their RDNA3 cards at around 17.5% less than their competitors, and that wasn't enough to move the needle. So they need to price even lower.

Basically they need to give an option where it's just so cheap that paying more for their competition would be silly, like they did with Ryzen.
Click to expand...

Imo, the reason a lot of people swerved AMD last gen was largely based on being told their Raytracing sucks and FSR is inferior to DLSS..

AMD NEED to match NVIDIA on RT, they can't stay 1-2 generations behind NVIDIA anymore, not now new games are coming out with RT as a requirement
 
terley said:
Imo, the reason a lot of people swerved AMD last gen was largely based on being told their Raytracing sucks and FSR is inferior to DLSS..

AMD NEED to match NVIDIA on RT, they can't stay 1-2 generations behind NVIDIA anymore, not now new games are coming out with RT as a requirement
Click to expand...
I agree - but even if that is no longer true with RDNA4, people will still believe exactly that.

I mean people are still hung up on AMD drivers when that hasn't been an issue for many years.

This is why they need to get people on board. People will just parrot what they're being told unless they try for themselves.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom