It’s about 5% superior in benchmarks at raster and 30-50% better at raytracing esp path.
It’s all there on the internet.
agree 5% better raster...not the rt 30-50%???
below at 1440p the ti is 14% faster at rt, and at 4k it's 17%..not to be sniffed at but not 30 to 50%...and HU had some weird figures..they had Indy Jones unplayable...I've just whacked it on..Had path tracing set to medium and graphics set to Supreme. Res 4k and no upscaling.. target locked at 60fps.. Full on path tracing taxes the 4090/5090 series cards, i doubt you'll be playing the 5070ti with everything set to max either...I know you'll get more on a 5070ti, but the 9070xt is infinitely playable...£100, I'd have a think about a 5070ti, but more than that, not sure...and as sasid before, that might be a top 9070xt vs a msrp 5070ti...get like for like, gap will be bigger
AMD's new RDNA 4 GPUs are launching today. The Sapphire Radeon RX 9070 XT Nitro+ is a fantastic custom design with powerful cooling and whisper-quiet fans. In terms of FPS, the RX 9070 XT offers competitive performance with similarly priced NVIDIA options in both raster and ray tracing.
www.techpowerup.com
. fsr4 better than dlss3, so seeing as that was good enough, upscaling no longer a selling point now. they can both do it well. If the new consoles have fsr4 (most likely), you'll see a lot of game developers putting it in there games, esp if amd gain mkt share with current gpu's (not going to be too hard seeing as nvidia not giving a monkey's at mo about gamers)
current price rise isn't amd I think...this is stock already purchased by retail, so already paid for...so this is purely increasing there margin. Also means they can keep stock in while they wait for new shipments...when stock builds, prices will drop again...and aib getting in on act too.
they're basically using the airline method of selling now..price is fluid and moves on demand
me taking photo of game on my c4. I don't think it's too shabby
I got dropped when the reqs increased
