• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: ** The AMD VEGA Thread **

On or off the hype train?

  • (off) Train has derailed

    Votes: 207 39.2%
  • (on) Overcrowding, standing room only

    Votes: 100 18.9%
  • (never ever got on) Chinese escalator

    Votes: 221 41.9%

  • Total voters
    528
Status
Not open for further replies.
Whether I order one depends on how they price the liquid model.
It's annoying how this late in the day they are still claiming they only have BETA drivers,
All that does is give the dreamers another reason to make excuses for Vega,
which I suppose is what AMD want.
It's all about price now. $699 for the water cooled is a lot and if UK sellers make it a one for one currency conversion
or worse more than that we might as well give up on AMD for gaming.
I'm tired of being shafted.

Yep, pricing is key. Let's hope it's in line.
 
I just don't understand those power figures and the performance, surely AMD know performance per watt is quite important for many.
Well, in fairness the RX400 had good performance for watt, nobody cared, looks like this time they are just focusing on performance and hoping that gains some traction.
 
Agreed. Who (other than militant fanboys) are going to pay £550 for a Vega 64 with drivers that "hopefully" improve. When they can get a tried and tested, faster, lower power 1080Ti for an extra £50.

Where pray tell? Cheapest I've seen in a long time was the £639 preorder here. Even then the Vega 64 at that price makes no sense.
 
Well, in fairness the RX400 had good performance for watt, nobody cared, looks like this time they are just focusing on performance and hoping that gains some traction.

That makes little sense as the performance isn't there compared to cards in the same price range? At least the RX480 (before mining pump) was a good price for cards in that price range.
 
Well, in fairness the RX400 had good performance for watt, nobody cared, looks like this time they are just focusing on performance and hoping that gains some traction.

Most of us AMD fans would be wiling to let slide the power consumption and even the price but the performance id not there for what they are charging and heat.
I could not care about 500w if it was performing 10%-20% faster than 1080TI.
 
People constantly arguing it's overpriced before the prices actually appear on the website :eek:

It's only 4 hours left to find out for real instead of stating as fact the unsure.
 
I'm not a fanboy and I hate the power consumption but my gaming is racing games rfactor 2 mainly, with that, guys in our league who have 1080ti's complain of massive fps drops I'm guessing it's game issues more than nvidia issues, but my r9 390 runs triple screens with no issues, the downside is it battles with games like project cars so all I'm after is something that will let me run both well, I'm hoping the vega 64 will be the answer because I fear a 1080 will run pcars fine but give me issues in rfactor2
 
Most of us AMD fans would be wiling to let slide the power consumption and even the price but the performance id not there for what they are charging and heat.
I could not care about 500w if it was performing 10%-20% faster than 1080TI.
AMD’s FineWine will ensure it will catch up to the 1080ti in time but Volta will be out by that time. I am not getting this card because of my 650W PSU being insufficient for it but if I had a 1000W PSU I would still get Vega over a 1080 as the performance will only improve over time while the 1080 is a done deal.
 
Well, in fairness the RX400 had good performance for watt, nobody cared, looks like this time they are just focusing on performance and hoping that gains some traction.
Problem is there is no performance to be had for that 520W furnace of a potato.
980Ti was released on the 2nd of june 2015, so we are all waiting here to get the same performance 2 years and 3 months later, for 500W and pay more for it ? Sounds good ?
 
People constantly arguing it's overpriced before the prices actually appear on the website :eek:

It's only 4 hours left to find out for real instead of stating as fact the unsure.

We know the dollar price and how that converts and it puts the water cooled RX Vega at the same price as the £640 non reference Gigabyte 1080ti.
They're not guesses they're confirmed numbers.

AMD’s FineWine will ensure it will catch up to the 1080ti in time but Volta will be out by that time. I am not getting this card because of my 650W PSU being insufficient for it but if I had a 1000W PSU I would still get Vega over a 1080 as the performance will only improve over time while the 1080 is a done deal.

It's called AMD's user promise not Fine Wine.
 
We know the dollar price and how that converts and it puts the water cooled RX Vega at the same price as the £640 non reference Gigabyte 1080ti.
They're not guesses they're confirmed numbers.

We know the $ price as it was at the end of July - they may have revised things to be more reasonable, probably not but you never know.
 
Not seen it in 2 days and here 24/7
b6b4f6095944affde44975b3a8cd23c8_1502679281_7538.jpg

b6b4f6095944affde44975b3a8cd23c8_1502678031_1912.jpg

Are at these power consumption figures at the wall or at the PCI-E power connectors??
 
hardto resist the Silver water edition just for looks and having a free-sync screen at home .
seen a review site has Alphacool AIO attached to an Air Vega 64 so interesting to see how it can do pushed - will the TDP limit hold it back
 
Okay I'm confused why people are still bothered.

We know for 99% certain that the Vega64 is 1080 performance level for double the power consumption and the same price almost a year later. Then we have the Vega64 AIO which will likely be just below 1080ti price inbetween 1080 and Ti performance for double the power consumption of the 1080Ti.

Finally we have the Vega54, which is likely the main alternative to Nvidia 1070 and the only Vega remotely worth thinking about at that price and performance level.

So why are people still bothered? Even for AMD die hards with Freesync monitors it would be more worth while to sell up and just buy a 1080Ti with a Gsync monitor.

Overall very disappointing as I wanted AMD to really take it to Nvidia, instead it's like they are purposely bending over and taking one hard up the GPU dirty pipe.

The only reason AMD might succeed here is if the mining hearsay of 60-100 is real, which it won't be and I think we all know the "friend of a friend said" thing was just a way of a certain retailer to build up hype for the miners so they can price hike on launch.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom