Why, he should hopefully stay gone this timeAs nice of an OS as OSX is, Apple are a hardware company. Also they tried licensing in the '90's - Jobs knocked that on the head quick fast when he came back, doubt they'll ever go down that route again.

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Why, he should hopefully stay gone this timeAs nice of an OS as OSX is, Apple are a hardware company. Also they tried licensing in the '90's - Jobs knocked that on the head quick fast when he came back, doubt they'll ever go down that route again.

Guess that one went over your head. Apple have done the retarded thing of naming their API the same as an existing Windows one (albeit one that hasn't been updated in years).
Metal was a low level API from S3 from 2001 or so.Certainly did. Never heard of a "Metal" for Windows. You're not thinking o hif "Mantle" are you?
Certainly did. Never heard of a "Metal" for Windows. You're not thinking of "Mantle" are you?
This has been asked of me a few times now and each time I've answered. Have a look around the web.
My criteria are: 1ms response, 27", 144hz Gsync/Freesync. £500-600.
Your find monitors from both camps that meet those criteria.
Out of interest why are you looking at £500 to £600 when you get get them for £300-£400 fine.
Below is a quick overview
1080p Freesync
iiyama - £300
Acer - £340
Samsung - £350
1440p Freesync
Acer - £360
1440p Gsync
AOC - 165Hz £420
ACER - 165Hz £500
Asus - 165Hz £630
So I would say it comes down to more if you want to pay extra for going from 144Hz to 165Hz at a minimum of £60 premium but either way they are much more available below your £500 outlined previous.

So this could be the card that finally beats the Ti then. What are we looking at? 8-900w overclocked tdp![]()
![]()
The liquid-cooled RX Vega 64 has a TDP of 350W, so a dual GPU card would likely draw at least 600W
So this could be the card that finally beats the Ti then. What are we looking at? 8-900w overclocked tdp![]()
![]()

Looks more like it's ASUS going into business for themselves again like with their dual R290X, their dual HD7970, their dual GTX680**Sad times, AMD resorting to dual GPU again to combat NV![]()
Out of interest why are you looking at £500 to £600 when you get get them for £300-£400 fine.
Below is a quick overview
1080p Freesync
iiyama - £300
Acer - £340
Samsung - £350
1440p Freesync
Acer - £360
1440p Gsync
AOC - 165Hz £420
ACER - 165Hz £500
Asus - 165Hz £630
So I would say it comes down to more if you want to pay extra for going from 144Hz to 165Hz at a minimum of £60 premium but either way they are much more available below your £500 outlined previous.
So this could be the card that finally beats the Ti then. What are we looking at? 8-900w overclocked tdp![]()
![]()
![]()
UT supported and supports just about every API going.
events
Which has better thermals
- 2x cards
- 2x chips on a single card
Which has better thermals
- 2x cards
- 2x chips on a single card
Shouldnt matter as long as the price is right and it works well. What are the chances of that? lol..Sad times, AMD resorting to dual GPU again to combat NV![]()