The anti Israel = anti semitism agenda

Status
Not open for further replies.
For some reason you think you can read people's minds....

For the tenth time it's got nothing to do with religion it's all to do with Zionist scum kicking Palestinians (who can be Christian but your hive mind think there all jew hating Muslims) out there houses.

Your too obtuse or deliberately bigoted to see beyond the issue of religion.

It's a human rights issue at the core.

If I was to think like you and had the power to read people's minds I would call you a middle aged old racist fart.

Agreed, I like to use prominent modern Jewish figures to spell out the criticism so I don’t get accused of being antisemitic

 
"Even if Hamas is operating out of a civilian building...".

Full stop.

Hamas is getting civilians killed if they are trying to attack Israel and hide behind civilians.
 
Well AP has said Hamas weren't there, so I think I trust AP over a government who has reason to propagandise the situation for domestic/foreign benefit.
 
Last edited:
Israel has said there are more days and more stages of this yet to come - doesn't sound like precursor to a ground incursion though - just more nights of bombings.
 
"Even if Hamas is operating out of a civilian building...".

Full stop.

Hamas is getting civilians killed if they are trying to attack Israel and hide behind civilians.

A bank was getting robbed, the robbers hid behind the bank staff, so we blew up the whole bank and all the hostages to stop it being robbed.

That is never ok. It’s a war crime. Israel needs to be stopped.
 
"Even if Hamas is operating out of a civilian building...".

Full stop.

Hamas is getting civilians killed if they are trying to attack Israel and hide behind civilians.

A) Why would various different media outfits share a building with Hamas? So far all the journalists based out of there said they never saw anything suspicious.

B) Even if they were there, Israel only claimed there were “military interests of the Hamas intelligence” in the building, not a rocket launching point.
 
"Even if Hamas is operating out of a civilian building...".

Full stop.

Hamas is getting civilians killed if they are trying to attack Israel and hide behind civilians.

Okay so say for a moment terrorists are in your childrens school. Do you blow up the school and all the kids to get the terrorists?
 
"Even if Hamas is operating out of a civilian building...".

Full stop.

Hamas is getting civilians killed if they are trying to attack Israel and hide behind civilians.

All the Islamic militant groups do this.

They don't care about the Geneva convention. Neither do the Islamic states either really.
 
My best mate?

All he is to me is a competent US President, and we haven't had one of those for about 4 years.


Fair enough.

But don't post about the killings when your mate Biden says it's ok.
That's unless you're going to have a go a biden as well for letting it happen.

If that was someone else(starting with a T). You would all over it and you know it.
 
Last edited:
There way of taking out leaders when in the open blowing up a resedential house at 2am and killing children is not the way.

47 children killed now more pulled out the rubble early morning and 174 Palestinian killed.

Hamas are no saints but this is one way traffic Gaza is defenceless.
 
As is failing to take adequate steps to prevent loss of civilian life, and judging from reports the Israeli courtesy knock before bombing is far from a standard approach.

Yes, but when the two interact, it becomes complicated. I tend to lean towards responsibility being on the people who are using the human shields as being the reason those people are hurt, but I accept that's a subjective view and others disagree. The real problem comes when people (as they often do) apply differing standards to the behaviour when Israel is involved, holding Israel to a higher standard than other countries, or holding the Palestinian authorities to a lower standard than they normally would.
 
All the Islamic militant groups do this.

They don't care about the Geneva convention. Neither do the Islamic states either really.

Israel has a history of using Palestinian civilians as human shields as well, although their own legal system has told them to stop doing so and it's no longer policy as it was 20-30 years ago

For the avoidance of doubt, I condemn all use of human shields, and place responsibility on those doing so if those civilians get hurt.
 
No point making a new thread as I guess it will just mirror this but the atrocities happening there now are quite horrific.

Seems every year its the same thing.

When will the international community get involved? UN? Anyone? All it looks like is leaders condemning actions but no real action being taken...
When will the international community get involved?
Never unless it benefits them or unless it becomes so bad they have no choice, normal people go on marches and demand but the people in power will not do anything.

Most don't want to go to war with the US, a lot will even back what they say or do (UK)
US is fine to start a war with everyone (I can't even count the number of wars they have started or backed) but they never get stopped that is the main issue, everything comes down to the US.

UN?
No chance, have they ever done anything other than just talk? I no longer see a point in it existing.


the only way this issue can be resolved IMO is 2 state with each getting part of Jerusalem (but both parties are stubborn) or the same way as SouthAfrica.


This is why there should be some sort of international organisation, that has a bite not just a bark, to 'enforce' laws to resolve conflict, based on human freedom and to reduce suffering and provide equal and fair opportunity for a good standard of living. I'd call this organisation UN perhaps, for Universal Normalisation, or something.


:-/
We have the UN in name but no real power, Useless
I agree we need a REAL UN with so many issues Around the world, so every nation is accountable for what they do. like people are (most people are)


"Islam is the faith of 1.4 billion people, Islamism is not a form of the Muslim faith or an expression of Muslim piety. Rather, it is a political ideology that strives to derive legitimacy from Islam."
I thought it was 1.8 billion people, maybe im wrong
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom