• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The ASIC benching thread, what does yours boost up to ?

I don't think stock setting will show anything important as all the numbers will be near enough the same for any given card series.

It's all or nothing as you push the card to the limit and see how far your asic % takes you. In my case, not very far ;)

Over time if we get enough results a pattern should start forming.:)
 
Hi, I hope this is sufficient, took the picture before realising you wanted a picture of the start screen:

QRwcpcd.png

Gigabyte G1 Gaming 980Ti
ASIC - 72.8%
GPU Clock - 1320MHz
Set Boost - 1409MHz
Max Boost - 1560MHz
Max Temp - 60c
Max VDDC - 1.243v

The results screen is fine.:)

And on the scoreboard.:)
 
All 980Ti's should be at 1.243v maxed out, we should have everyone either at stock volts of 1.199v or max oc volts to be consistent really.

The problem with that is when people start using EVGA Classified 980 Ti's with custom bios and volts.:)

If we can get enough results we can build up a picture of how ASIC works across a range of voltages and temps.:)
 
Hey Kaap,

Have you thought about doing a second scoreboard for default voltage? No custom BIOS cards allowed on that table, or any pre-over volted cards.

A lot of people have been requesting it and I don't necessarily see what's wrong with having a second one :p

It is a nice idea and I did think about it but it is unworkable.

If we use the GTX 980 Ti as an example, the non ref ones don't use the same bios, the same default clocks, the same default voltage or even the same memory chips. Even the reference cards are a pain as the EVGA SC will use a different bios and clocks to all the rest.:)
 
Hi again Kaap,

Would it not make more sense for this thread to be sorted by the biggest difference between "boost clock" in GPU-Z and the actual boost? - That's what the thread is investigating, right?

Or is it more based on just how high you can get your card based on ASIC?

Either way, I think both are fairly interesting points that should be investigated.

It is based on how high you can get your card based on ASIC compared to temp and voltage used.

If it was based on the difference between "boost clock" in GPU-Z and the actual boost things would come unstuck when someone used a custom bios where the difference can be quite small yet the final clockspeed quite high.
 
Back
Top Bottom