It's sarcasm, as usual.
Aimed at the tw*i*ts who think that just because a player is of a certain age they need to be discarded as they are holding back their team and just because a player may be an utter **** in his private life he needs to be discarded.
Giggs is as valuable to Man.U. as JT or Cole are to Chelsea yet they're all ***** privately apparently, although Giggs owns that crown.
Age is irrelevant if they're good enough.
Well Cole's just had a contract extension and Terry's doesn't expire until the end of next season so I guess you mean Lampard who might still get one.isn't the rumor the older players at chelsea aren't getting contracts due to FFP and any complications their huge wages would have
I hope you change your mind & give him one as all the ex managers & coaches who've spoken about him have all said there's never been a problem with him.Terry isn't getting a new contract because he was the conspiring against several of the Chelsea managers. No player is bigger than the club!
Arsenal poised to be subjected to £1.5bn takeover bid from Middle East consortium within the next few weeks
Why does it seem like good business?
He has been at the club for less than a year and has made a lot of lifestyle changes and fitness changes that won't work overnight, it will mean he can get fitter and stronger. This is a slight setback and it might not be that bad as he walked off unaided and may have just not wanted to take the risk of playing on.