The BBC..... Really

Gigabit said:
What I don't understand about this so-called bias is that the BBC, being a TV corporation, means that everything they report is filmed so you can literally see what is going on.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Like that Panorama episode with John Sweeney. It was plain to see how it was just absolute bull **** propaganda. I mean this guy walks into a random office, asks some random guy "so what proof is there that russia hacked the vote", and this guy just displays a Russian IP address on his computer screen and says "there's the evidence that russia hacked the vote".

And don't forget the fake warzone scene with John running through crossfire. Had to be done for emotional milkage, as if the BBC's H&S and Insurance depts would have let John walk 2 minutes through an actual warzone for a 30 minute BS propaganda piece. :D

It's absolutely obvious that the same people who faked the WMD nonsense for Blair, are trying their damned hardest to fake more war sparking BS.
 
Last edited:
asim18 said:
Exactly. Like that Panorama episode with John Sweeney. It was plain to see how it was just absolute bull **** propaganda. I mean this guy walks into a random office, asks some random guy "so what proof is there that russia hacked the vote", and this guy just displays a Russian IP address on his computer screen and says "there's the evidence that russia hacked the vote".

And don't forget the fake warzone scene with John running through crossfire. Had to be done for emotional milkage, as if the BBC's H&S and Insurance depts would have let John walk 2 minutes through an actual warzone for a 30 minute BS propaganda piece. :D

It's absolutely obvious that the same people who faked the WMD nonsense for Blair, are trying their damned hardest to fake more war sparking BS.
Click to expand...

One word of your post is logical and then it descends into madness unfortunately. At least you tried.
 
VincentHanna said:
Asim18 - I'm not entirely sure I want to take you "quotes" at face value.

For someone that hates the BBC so much you watch a lot of Panorama.
Click to expand...

Don't lol. Just watch the Panorama episode then. My quotes are pretty much 95% spot on with what happened in the episode. lol.

I don't hate the BBC. I hate BS and psychological manipulation from any media outlet. I watch BBC for analysis purposes not informational purposes.

But yeah don't take my quotes at face value but keep on taking BS quotes from a known BS propagation website like "The climate crisis is a racist crisis" at face value lol. I really feel sorry for some people. So ignorant. No idea what's going on around them. Constant denial. :(

Gigabit said:
One word of your post is logical and then it descends into madness unfortunately. At least you tried.
Click to expand...

But you haven't tried at all lol.

Maybe explain what is illogical? Or are you denying what happened in the panorama episode? I've just given TWO things which happened in that panorama episode and your automatic retort is that I'm descending into madness? Well blame the BBC for that, I'm just telling you what happened in the show lmao. :D
 
Last edited:
asim18 said:
Don't lol. Just watch the Panorama episode then. My quotes are pretty much 95% spot on with what happened in the episode. lol.

I don't hate the BBC. I hate BS and psychological manipulation from any media outlet. I watch BBC for analysis purposes not informational purposes.

But yeah don't take my quotes at face value but keep on taking BS quotes from a known BS propagation website like "The climate crisis is a racist crisis" at face value lol. I really feel sorry for some people. So ignorant. No idea what's going on around them. Constant denial. :(



But you haven't tried at all lol.

Maybe explain what is illogical? Or are you denying what happened in the panorama episode? I've just given TWO things which happened in that panorama episode and your automatic retort is that I'm descending into madness? Well blame the BBC for that, I'm just telling you what happened in the show lmao. :D
Click to expand...

Your view about the BBC being biased is mad.
 
Gigabit said:
Your view about the BBC being biased is mad.
Click to expand...

Where did I say the BBC is biased?

I said they're bull ****. not biased. John Sweeney in that particular episode is unbelievably biased though lol.

And you're still concerned about me. It's not about my views of the BBC, they made that panorama episode not me. If you cant see how it's a load of BS then simply calling the person who is able to recognise the BS in that show "mad" is disingenuous.
 
And this morning, put BBC News on (should have known better), to get an extended documentary (i.e. not news) lecturing car drivers to switch their engines off in a traffic jam to mitigate air pollution. Trot out obligatory liberalista air pollution campaigner(s)/anti-car mob to add weight, then cut to clip of kids outside a school waving suitable placards (and how much pollution did sending an "away team" to film that incur?)

That's the sort of article that belongs on Panorama or, as used to be, Nationwide.

I also question the validity of some of the argument. Switching a vehicle engine off and on repeatedly adds wear and tear to the components, possibly resulting in a shorter life and early replacement, so how much "pollution" needed to make and distribute those parts esp. the battery? Switching the engine on usually revs up initially which puts a blast of exhaust out the back. In the cold weather you need the engine running to keep warm and from the legal POV, windows demisted. Most modern cars have complex electrical systems which rely on a steady flow of power from the alternator.

Don't misunderstand, I try and do my bit - often walk or cycle rather than using the car. However, what the BBC conveniently overlook in their dogmatic frenzy is so long as China, India USA and Mexico are belching out air pollution en masse, a few drivers switching their engines off for two minutes in a jam will make naff all difference. What we need is a road system that keeps traffic flowing, so sitting in a jam doesn't become an issue. And where are the affordable electric or hybrid cars? If I have £8k to replace the family hack, I can go out and buy a half decent three year old petrol or diesel car - forget anything electric (and the energy still has to come from somewhere).

Sorry if I digressed a bit, but this one sided report on Breakfast is exactly what winds me up about the BBC. :)
 
We need a short factual non biased news program that does not wheel out so called experts to give their view on a situation so we can make our own minds up about things. No manufactured news to 'pad' out the program, if there is not much news to report on that day, just shorten the program down!
 
Vern1961 said:
And this morning, put BBC News on (should have known better), to get an extended documentary (i.e. not news) lecturing car drivers to switch their engines off in a traffic jam to mitigate air pollution. Trot out obligatory liberalista air pollution campaigner(s)/anti-car mob to add weight, then cut to clip of kids outside a school waving suitable placards (and how much pollution did sending an "away team" to film that incur?)

That's the sort of article that belongs on Panorama or, as used to be, Nationwide.

I also question the validity of some of the argument. Switching a vehicle engine off and on repeatedly adds wear and tear to the components, possibly resulting in a shorter life and early replacement, so how much "pollution" needed to make and distribute those parts esp. the battery? Switching the engine on usually revs up initially which puts a blast of exhaust out the back. In the cold weather you need the engine running to keep warm and from the legal POV, windows demisted. Most modern cars have complex electrical systems which rely on a steady flow of power from the alternator.

Don't misunderstand, I try and do my bit - often walk or cycle rather than using the car. However, what the BBC conveniently overlook in their dogmatic frenzy is so long as China, India USA and Mexico are belching out air pollution en masse, a few drivers switching their engines off for two minutes in a jam will make naff all difference. What we need is a road system that keeps traffic flowing, so sitting in a jam doesn't become an issue. And where are the affordable electric or hybrid cars? If I have £8k to replace the family hack, I can go out and buy a half decent three year old petrol or diesel car - forget anything electric (and the energy still has to come from somewhere).

Sorry if I digressed a bit, but this one sided report on Breakfast is exactly what winds me up about the BBC. :)
Click to expand...
I was watching that this morning, proper wound me up to the extent I turned over to watch Piers Morgan and Susanna Reid. I object to this use of children to get across TPTB's message; kids are institutionalised at that age, taught to believe what their teacher tells them is right and to repeat it verbatim for tests. It's very difficult for adults to tell kids that what their teachers are telling them is wrong.

Last week, also on the BBC there was a report on a school child in my local area (South) who had done a pretty technically impressive stop-motion animation about the plight of the polar bear, featuring a mummy polar bear and her cub drowning as the ice they were on melted. Then there was an "interview" with the child lecturing us on how we must stop using our cars and start cycling instead. I later found out that polar bear numbers have actually increased since 2001.

It's always the car as well that they want people to stop using, but actually we know that the greatest proportion of this country's dreadful pollution problem comes from around 10% of the vehicles - mostly old buses and lorries. It's why London's Oxford St, where cars are banned, has the worst levels of air pollution in the country.
 
How is he biased?

I just wish he would stop letting Labour and the tories on, all they do is rattle off **** pledges and argue with each other and waste like half the show on things they couldn't give a single **** for.
 
Predominalty leftie fools. Can't believe I used to think anything the BBC wrote was gospel. Used to be so naive :/

BTW has anyone read anything *positive* from the BBC about Trump?....
 
9n4ao0m6fzjy.jpg


See this doing the rounds on reddit.

LOL BBC.

Edit: Dug up source
https://twitter.com/x/status/838925697917792256
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom